This file is indexed.

/usr/include/NTL/ctools.h is in libntl-dev 6.2.1-1.

This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.

The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
#ifndef NTL_ctools__H
#define NTL_ctools__H

#include <NTL/config.h>
#include <NTL/mach_desc.h>


/*
 * Resolve double-word integer types.
 *
 * Unfortunately, there is no "standard" way to do this.
 * On 32-bit machines, 'long long' usually works (but not
 * on MSVC++ or BORLAND), and on 64-bit machines, there is
 * no standard.  However, most compilers do offer *some*
 * non-standard double-word type.  
 *
 * Note that C99 creates a standard header <stdint.h>,
 * but it is not clear how widely this is implemented yet,
 * and for example, GCC does not provide a type int128_t 
 * in <stdint.h> on 64-bit machines.
 */


#if (defined(NTL_LONG_LONG_TYPE))

#define NTL_LL_TYPE NTL_LONG_LONG_TYPE

#elif (NTL_BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && defined(__GNUC__))

#define NTL_LL_TYPE __int128_t

#elif (NTL_BITS_PER_LONG == 32 && (defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)))

#define NTL_LL_TYPE __int64

#elif (NTL_BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && (defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)))

#define NTL_LL_TYPE __int128

#endif

#if (!defined(NTL_LL_TYPE))

#define NTL_LL_TYPE long long

#endif



#if (defined(NTL_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_TYPE))

#define NTL_ULL_TYPE NTL_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_TYPE

#elif (NTL_BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && defined(__GNUC__))

#define NTL_ULL_TYPE __uint128_t

#elif (NTL_BITS_PER_LONG == 32 && (defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)))

#define NTL_ULL_TYPE unsigned __int64

#elif (NTL_BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && (defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)))

#define NTL_ULL_TYPE unsigned __int128

#endif

#if (!defined(NTL_ULL_TYPE))

#define NTL_ULL_TYPE unsigned long long

#endif


/********************************************************/







#define NTL_OVFBND (1L << (NTL_BITS_PER_LONG-4))

/*
 * NTL_OVFBND is the general bound used throughout NTL to keep various
 * integer values comfortably bounded away from an integer overflow
 * condition.  Do not change this value!
 */





#if ((NTL_BITS_PER_SIZE_T-1) < (NTL_BITS_PER_LONG-4))
#define NTL_OVFBND1 (1L << (NTL_BITS_PER_SIZE_T-1))
#else
#define NTL_OVFBND1 NTL_OVFBND
#endif

/*
 * NTL_OVFBND1 is a smaller bound than NTL_OVF when size_t is
 * narrower than long.  This prevents overflow on calls to malloc
 * and realloc.
 */






#define NTL_OVERFLOW(n, a, b) \
   (((b) >= NTL_OVFBND) || (((long) (n)) > 0 && (((a) >= NTL_OVFBND) || \
    (((long) (n)) >= (NTL_OVFBND-((long)(b))+((long)(a))-1)/((long)(a))))))

/*
 * NTL_OVERFLOW(n, a, b) returns 1 if n*a + b >= NTL_OVFBND,
 * and returns 0 otherwise.  The value n is effectively treated as type long,
 * while the values a and b may be *any* integral type.  It is assumed that
 * n >= 0, a > 0, and b >= 0.  Care is taken to ensure that overflow does
 * not occur. If a and b are constants, and n has no side effects,
 * a good optimizing compiler will * translate this into a single test 
 * of the form n >= c, where c is a constant.
 */






#define NTL_OVERFLOW1(n, a, b) \
   (((b) >= NTL_OVFBND1) || (((long) (n)) > 0 && (((a) >= NTL_OVFBND1) || \
    (((long) (n)) >= (NTL_OVFBND1-((long)(b))+((long)(a))-1)/((long)(a))))))

/*
 * NTL_OVERFLOW1 is the same as NTL_OVERFLOW, except that it uses the
 * bound NTL_OVFBND1 instead of NTL_OVFBND.
 */





#define NTL_MALLOC(n, a, b) \
   (NTL_OVERFLOW1(n, a, b) ? ((void *) 0) : \
    ((void *) malloc(((long)(n))*((long)(a)) + ((long)(b)))))

/*
 * NTL_MALLOC(n, a, b) returns 0 if a*n + b >= NTL_OVFBND1, and otherwise
 * returns malloc(n*a + b). 
 * The programmer must ensure that the name "malloc" is visible
 * at the point in the source code where this macro is expanded.
 */






#define NTL_SNS_MALLOC(n, a, b) \
   (NTL_OVERFLOW1(n, a, b) ? ((void *) 0) : \
    ((void *) NTL_SNS malloc(((long)(n))*((long)(a)) + ((long)(b)))))

/*
 * NTL_SNS_MALLOC is the same as NTL_MALLOC, except that the call
 * to malloc is prefixed by NTL_SNS.
 */








#define NTL_REALLOC(p, n, a, b) \
   (NTL_OVERFLOW1(n, a, b) ? ((void *) 0) : \
    ((void *) realloc((p), ((long)(n))*((long)(a)) + ((long)(b)))))

/*
 * NTL_REALLOC(n, a, b) returns 0 if a*n + b >= NTL_OVFBND1, and otherwise
 * returns realloc(p, n*a + b).
 * The programmer must ensure that the name "realloc" is visible
 * at the point in the source code where this macro is expanded.
 */






#define NTL_SNS_REALLOC(p, n, a, b) \
   (NTL_OVERFLOW1(n, a, b) ? ((void *) 0) : \
    ((void *) NTL_SNS realloc((p), ((long)(n))*((long)(a)) + ((long)(b)))))

/*
 * NTL_SNS_REALLOC is the same as NTL_REALLOC, except that the call
 * to realloc is prefixed by NTL_SNS.
 */





#define NTL_MAX_ALLOC_BLOCK (40000)

/*
 * NTL_MAX_ALLOC_BLOCK is the number of bytes that are allocated in
 * a single block in a number of places throughout NTL (for
 * vec_ZZ_p, ZZVec, vec_GF2X, and GF2XVec).
 */


#define NTL_ULONG_TO_LONG(a) \
   ((((unsigned long) a) >> (NTL_BITS_PER_LONG-1)) ? \
    (((long) (((unsigned long) a) - ((unsigned long) NTL_MIN_LONG))) + \
       NTL_MIN_LONG) : \
    ((long) a))

/* 
 * This macro converts from unsigned long to signed long.  It is portable
 * among platforms for which a long has a 2's complement representation
 * of the same width as an unsigned long.  While it avoids assumptions
 * about the behavior of non-standard conversions,  a good optimizing
 * compiler should turn it into the identity function.
 */


#define NTL_UINT_TO_INT(a) \
   ((((unsigned int) a) >> (NTL_BITS_PER_INT-1)) ? \
    (((int) (((unsigned int) a) - ((unsigned int) NTL_MIN_INT))) + \
       NTL_MIN_INT) : \
    ((int) a))

/* 
 * This macro converts from unsigned int to signed int.  It is portable
 * among platforms for which an int has a 2's complement representation
 * of the same width as an unsigned int.  While it avoids assumptions
 * about the behavior of non-standard conversions,  a good optimizing
 * compiler should turn it into the identity function.
 */


#define NTL_THREAD_LOCAL 

/* 
 * placeholder for now...it will eventually be defined as thread_local
 */


#define NTL_RELEASE_THRESH (128)

/*
 * threshold for releasing scratch memory.
 */



long _ntl_IsFinite(double *p);
/* This forces a double into memory, and tests if it is "normal";
   that means, not NaN, not +/- infinity, not denormalized, etc.
   Forcing into memory is sometimes necessary on machines 
   with "extended" double precision registers (e.g., Intel x86s)
   to force the standard IEEE format. */

void _ntl_ForceToMem(double *p);
/* This is do-nothing routine that has the effect of forcing
   a double into memory (see comment above). */

double _ntl_ldexp(double x, long e);

void _ntl_abort();
/* This is the routine called by NTL to abort a program in case of error. */

void _ntl_abort_cxx_callback();
/* This is a C++ function (implemented in tools.c) that is
   used to implement the callback mechanism.  The issue here
   is that I don't want a C function to call a C++ function
   via a function pointer.  This could potentially be problematic. 
   EDIT: since changing over to all-C++, this is now moot.
*/

   
   

#endif