/usr/include/coin/CoinPresolveDupcol.hpp is in coinor-libcoinutils-dev 2.9.15-3.1.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 | /* $Id: CoinPresolveDupcol.hpp 1550 2012-08-28 14:55:18Z forrest $ */
// Copyright (C) 2002, International Business Machines
// Corporation and others. All Rights Reserved.
// This code is licensed under the terms of the Eclipse Public License (EPL).
#ifndef CoinPresolveDupcol_H
#define CoinPresolveDupcol_H
#include "CoinPresolveMatrix.hpp"
/*!
\file
*/
#define DUPCOL 10
/*! \class dupcol_action
\brief Detect and remove duplicate columns
The general technique is to sum the coefficients a_(*,j) of each column.
Columns with identical sums are duplicates. The obvious problem is that,
<i>e.g.</i>, [1 0 1 0] and [0 1 0 1] both add to 2. To minimize the
chances of false positives, the coefficients of each row are multipled by
a random number r_i, so that we sum r_i*a_ij.
Candidate columns are checked to confirm they are identical. Where the
columns have the same objective coefficient, the two are combined. If the
columns have different objective coefficients, complications ensue. In order
to remove the duplicate, it must be possible to fix the variable at a bound.
*/
class dupcol_action : public CoinPresolveAction {
dupcol_action();
dupcol_action(const dupcol_action& rhs);
dupcol_action& operator=(const dupcol_action& rhs);
struct action {
double thislo;
double thisup;
double lastlo;
double lastup;
int ithis;
int ilast;
double *colels;
int nincol;
};
const int nactions_;
// actions_ is owned by the class and must be deleted at destruction
const action *const actions_;
dupcol_action(int nactions, const action *actions,
const CoinPresolveAction *next) :
CoinPresolveAction(next),
nactions_(nactions),
actions_(actions) {}
public:
const char *name() const;
static const CoinPresolveAction *presolve(CoinPresolveMatrix *prob,
const CoinPresolveAction *next);
void postsolve(CoinPostsolveMatrix *prob) const;
virtual ~dupcol_action();
};
/*! \class duprow_action
\brief Detect and remove duplicate rows
The algorithm to detect duplicate rows is as outlined for dupcol_action.
If the feasible interval for one constraint is strictly contained in the
other, the tighter (contained) constraint is kept. If the feasible
intervals are disjoint, the problem is infeasible. If the feasible
intervals overlap, both constraints are kept.
duprow_action is definitely a work in progress; #postsolve is
unimplemented.
This doesn't matter as it uses useless_constraint.
*/
class duprow_action : public CoinPresolveAction {
struct action {
int row;
double lbound;
double ubound;
};
const int nactions_;
const action *const actions_;
duprow_action():CoinPresolveAction(NULL),nactions_(0),actions_(NULL) {}
duprow_action(int nactions,
const action *actions,
const CoinPresolveAction *next) :
CoinPresolveAction(next),
nactions_(nactions), actions_(actions) {}
public:
const char *name() const;
static const CoinPresolveAction *presolve(CoinPresolveMatrix *prob,
const CoinPresolveAction *next);
void postsolve(CoinPostsolveMatrix *prob) const;
//~duprow_action() { delete[]actions_; }
};
/*! \class gubrow_action
\brief Detect and remove entries whose sum is known
If we have an equality row where all entries same then
For other rows where all entries for that equality row are same
then we can delete entries and modify rhs
gubrow_action is definitely a work in progress; #postsolve is
unimplemented.
*/
class gubrow_action : public CoinPresolveAction {
struct action {
int row;
double lbound;
double ubound;
};
const int nactions_;
const action *const actions_;
gubrow_action():CoinPresolveAction(NULL),nactions_(0),actions_(NULL) {}
gubrow_action(int nactions,
const action *actions,
const CoinPresolveAction *next) :
CoinPresolveAction(next),
nactions_(nactions), actions_(actions) {}
public:
const char *name() const;
static const CoinPresolveAction *presolve(CoinPresolveMatrix *prob,
const CoinPresolveAction *next);
void postsolve(CoinPostsolveMatrix *prob) const;
//~gubrow_action() { delete[]actions_; }
};
/*! \class twoxtwo_action
\brief Detect interesting 2 by 2 blocks
If a variable has two entries and for each row there are only
two entries with same other variable then we can get rid of
one constraint and modify costs.
This is a work in progress - I need more examples
*/
class twoxtwo_action : public CoinPresolveAction {
struct action {
double lbound_row;
double ubound_row;
double lbound_col;
double ubound_col;
double cost_col;
double cost_othercol;
int row;
int col;
int othercol;
};
const int nactions_;
const action *const actions_;
twoxtwo_action():CoinPresolveAction(NULL),nactions_(0),actions_(NULL) {}
twoxtwo_action(int nactions,
const action *actions,
const CoinPresolveAction *next) :
CoinPresolveAction(next),
nactions_(nactions), actions_(actions) {}
public:
const char *name() const;
static const CoinPresolveAction *presolve(CoinPresolveMatrix *prob,
const CoinPresolveAction *next);
void postsolve(CoinPostsolveMatrix *prob) const;
~twoxtwo_action() { delete [] actions_; }
};
#endif
|