/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/spambayes/classifier.py is in spambayes 1.1b1-1.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 | #! /usr/bin/env python
from __future__ import generators
# An implementation of a Bayes-like spam classifier.
#
# Paul Graham's original description:
#
# http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html
#
# A highly fiddled version of that can be retrieved from our CVS repository,
# via tag Last-Graham. This made many demonstrated improvements in error
# rates over Paul's original description.
#
# This code implements Gary Robinson's suggestions, the core of which are
# well explained on his webpage:
#
# http://radio.weblogs.com/0101454/stories/2002/09/16/spamDetection.html
#
# This is theoretically cleaner, and in testing has performed at least as
# well as our highly tuned Graham scheme did, often slightly better, and
# sometimes much better. It also has "a middle ground", which people like:
# the scores under Paul's scheme were almost always very near 0 or very near
# 1, whether or not the classification was correct. The false positives
# and false negatives under Gary's basic scheme (use_gary_combining) generally
# score in a narrow range around the corpus's best spam_cutoff value.
# However, it doesn't appear possible to guess the best spam_cutoff value in
# advance, and it's touchy.
#
# The last version of the Gary-combining scheme can be retrieved from our
# CVS repository via tag Last-Gary.
#
# The chi-combining scheme used by default here gets closer to the theoretical
# basis of Gary's combining scheme, and does give extreme scores, but also
# has a very useful middle ground (small # of msgs spread across a large range
# of scores, and good cutoff values aren't touchy).
#
# This implementation is due to Tim Peters et alia.
import math
# XXX At time of writing, these are only necessary for the
# XXX experimental url retrieving/slurping code. If that
# XXX gets ripped out, either rip these out, or run
# XXX PyChecker over the code.
import re
import os
import sys
import socket
import urllib2
from email import message_from_string
DOMAIN_AND_PORT_RE = re.compile(r"([^:/\\]+)(:([\d]+))?")
HTTP_ERROR_RE = re.compile(r"HTTP Error ([\d]+)")
URL_KEY_RE = re.compile(r"[\W]")
# XXX ---- ends ----
from spambayes.Options import options
from spambayes.chi2 import chi2Q
from spambayes.safepickle import pickle_read, pickle_write
LN2 = math.log(2) # used frequently by chi-combining
slurp_wordstream = None
PICKLE_VERSION = 5
class WordInfo(object):
# A WordInfo is created for each distinct word. spamcount is the
# number of trained spam msgs in which the word appears, and hamcount
# the number of trained ham msgs.
#
# Invariant: For use in a classifier database, at least one of
# spamcount and hamcount must be non-zero.
#
# Important: This is a tiny object. Use of __slots__ is essential
# to conserve memory.
__slots__ = 'spamcount', 'hamcount'
def __init__(self):
self.__setstate__((0, 0))
def __repr__(self):
return "WordInfo" + repr((self.spamcount, self.hamcount))
def __getstate__(self):
return self.spamcount, self.hamcount
def __setstate__(self, t):
self.spamcount, self.hamcount = t
class Classifier:
# Defining __slots__ here made Jeremy's life needlessly difficult when
# trying to hook this all up to ZODB as a persistent object. There's
# no space benefit worth getting from slots in this class; slots were
# used solely to help catch errors earlier, when this code was changing
# rapidly.
#__slots__ = ('wordinfo', # map word to WordInfo record
# 'nspam', # number of spam messages learn() has seen
# 'nham', # number of non-spam messages learn() has seen
# )
# allow a subclass to use a different class for WordInfo
WordInfoClass = WordInfo
def __init__(self):
self.wordinfo = {}
self.probcache = {}
self.nspam = self.nham = 0
def __getstate__(self):
return (PICKLE_VERSION, self.wordinfo, self.nspam, self.nham)
def __setstate__(self, t):
if t[0] != PICKLE_VERSION:
raise ValueError("Can't unpickle -- version %s unknown" % t[0])
(self.wordinfo, self.nspam, self.nham) = t[1:]
self.probcache = {}
# spamprob() implementations. One of the following is aliased to
# spamprob, depending on option settings.
# Currently only chi-squared is available, but maybe there will be
# an alternative again someday.
# Across vectors of length n, containing random uniformly-distributed
# probabilities, -2*sum(ln(p_i)) follows the chi-squared distribution
# with 2*n degrees of freedom. This has been proven (in some
# appropriate sense) to be the most sensitive possible test for
# rejecting the hypothesis that a vector of probabilities is uniformly
# distributed. Gary Robinson's original scheme was monotonic *with*
# this test, but skipped the details. Turns out that getting closer
# to the theoretical roots gives a much sharper classification, with
# a very small (in # of msgs), but also very broad (in range of scores),
# "middle ground", where most of the mistakes live. In particular,
# this scheme seems immune to all forms of "cancellation disease": if
# there are many strong ham *and* spam clues, this reliably scores
# close to 0.5. Most other schemes are extremely certain then -- and
# often wrong.
def chi2_spamprob(self, wordstream, evidence=False):
"""Return best-guess probability that wordstream is spam.
wordstream is an iterable object producing words.
The return value is a float in [0.0, 1.0].
If optional arg evidence is True, the return value is a pair
probability, evidence
where evidence is a list of (word, probability) pairs.
"""
from math import frexp, log as ln
# We compute two chi-squared statistics, one for ham and one for
# spam. The sum-of-the-logs business is more sensitive to probs
# near 0 than to probs near 1, so the spam measure uses 1-p (so
# that high-spamprob words have greatest effect), and the ham
# measure uses p directly (so that lo-spamprob words have greatest
# effect).
#
# For optimization, sum-of-logs == log-of-product, and f.p.
# multiplication is a lot cheaper than calling ln(). It's easy
# to underflow to 0.0, though, so we simulate unbounded dynamic
# range via frexp. The real product H = this H * 2**Hexp, and
# likewise the real product S = this S * 2**Sexp.
H = S = 1.0
Hexp = Sexp = 0
clues = self._getclues(wordstream)
for prob, word, record in clues:
S *= 1.0 - prob
H *= prob
if S < 1e-200: # prevent underflow
S, e = frexp(S)
Sexp += e
if H < 1e-200: # prevent underflow
H, e = frexp(H)
Hexp += e
# Compute the natural log of the product = sum of the logs:
# ln(x * 2**i) = ln(x) + i * ln(2).
S = ln(S) + Sexp * LN2
H = ln(H) + Hexp * LN2
n = len(clues)
if n:
S = 1.0 - chi2Q(-2.0 * S, 2*n)
H = 1.0 - chi2Q(-2.0 * H, 2*n)
# How to combine these into a single spam score? We originally
# used (S-H)/(S+H) scaled into [0., 1.], which equals S/(S+H). A
# systematic problem is that we could end up being near-certain
# a thing was (for example) spam, even if S was small, provided
# that H was much smaller.
# Rob Hooft stared at these problems and invented the measure
# we use now, the simpler S-H, scaled into [0., 1.].
prob = (S-H + 1.0) / 2.0
else:
prob = 0.5
if evidence:
clues = [(w, p) for p, w, _r in clues]
clues.sort(lambda a, b: cmp(a[1], b[1]))
clues.insert(0, ('*S*', S))
clues.insert(0, ('*H*', H))
return prob, clues
else:
return prob
def slurping_spamprob(self, wordstream, evidence=False):
"""Do the standard chi-squared spamprob, but if the evidence
leaves the score in the unsure range, and we have fewer tokens
than max_discriminators, also generate tokens from the text
obtained by following http URLs in the message."""
h_cut = options["Categorization", "ham_cutoff"]
s_cut = options["Categorization", "spam_cutoff"]
# Get the raw score.
prob, clues = self.chi2_spamprob(wordstream, True)
# If necessary, enhance it with the tokens from whatever is
# at the URL's destination.
if len(clues) < options["Classifier", "max_discriminators"] and \
prob > h_cut and prob < s_cut and slurp_wordstream:
slurp_tokens = list(self._generate_slurp())
slurp_tokens.extend([w for (w, _p) in clues])
sprob, sclues = self.chi2_spamprob(slurp_tokens, True)
if sprob < h_cut or sprob > s_cut:
prob = sprob
clues = sclues
if evidence:
return prob, clues
return prob
if options["Classifier", "use_chi_squared_combining"]:
if options["URLRetriever", "x-slurp_urls"]:
spamprob = slurping_spamprob
else:
spamprob = chi2_spamprob
def learn(self, wordstream, is_spam):
"""Teach the classifier by example.
wordstream is a word stream representing a message. If is_spam is
True, you're telling the classifier this message is definitely spam,
else that it's definitely not spam.
"""
if options["Classifier", "use_bigrams"]:
wordstream = self._enhance_wordstream(wordstream)
if options["URLRetriever", "x-slurp_urls"]:
wordstream = self._add_slurped(wordstream)
self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam)
def unlearn(self, wordstream, is_spam):
"""In case of pilot error, call unlearn ASAP after screwing up.
Pass the same arguments you passed to learn().
"""
if options["Classifier", "use_bigrams"]:
wordstream = self._enhance_wordstream(wordstream)
if options["URLRetriever", "x-slurp_urls"]:
wordstream = self._add_slurped(wordstream)
self._remove_msg(wordstream, is_spam)
def probability(self, record):
"""Compute, store, and return prob(msg is spam | msg contains word).
This is the Graham calculation, but stripped of biases, and
stripped of clamping into 0.01 thru 0.99. The Bayesian
adjustment following keeps them in a sane range, and one
that naturally grows the more evidence there is to back up
a probability.
"""
spamcount = record.spamcount
hamcount = record.hamcount
# Try the cache first
try:
return self.probcache[spamcount][hamcount]
except KeyError:
pass
nham = float(self.nham or 1)
nspam = float(self.nspam or 1)
assert hamcount <= nham, "Token seen in more ham than ham trained."
hamratio = hamcount / nham
assert spamcount <= nspam, "Token seen in more spam than spam trained."
spamratio = spamcount / nspam
prob = spamratio / (hamratio + spamratio)
S = options["Classifier", "unknown_word_strength"]
StimesX = S * options["Classifier", "unknown_word_prob"]
# Now do Robinson's Bayesian adjustment.
#
# s*x + n*p(w)
# f(w) = --------------
# s + n
#
# I find this easier to reason about like so (equivalent when
# s != 0):
#
# x - p
# p + -------
# 1 + n/s
#
# IOW, it moves p a fraction of the distance from p to x, and
# less so the larger n is, or the smaller s is.
n = hamcount + spamcount
prob = (StimesX + n * prob) / (S + n)
# Update the cache
try:
self.probcache[spamcount][hamcount] = prob
except KeyError:
self.probcache[spamcount] = {hamcount: prob}
return prob
# NOTE: Graham's scheme had a strange asymmetry: when a word appeared
# n>1 times in a single message, training added n to the word's hamcount
# or spamcount, but predicting scored words only once. Tests showed
# that adding only 1 in training, or scoring more than once when
# predicting, hurt under the Graham scheme.
# This isn't so under Robinson's scheme, though: results improve
# if training also counts a word only once. The mean ham score decreases
# significantly and consistently, ham score variance decreases likewise,
# mean spam score decreases (but less than mean ham score, so the spread
# increases), and spam score variance increases.
# I (Tim) speculate that adding n times under the Graham scheme helped
# because it acted against the various ham biases, giving frequently
# repeated spam words (like "Viagra") a quick ramp-up in spamprob; else,
# adding only once in training, a word like that was simply ignored until
# it appeared in 5 distinct training spams. Without the ham-favoring
# biases, though, and never ignoring words, counting n times introduces
# a subtle and unhelpful bias.
# There does appear to be some useful info in how many times a word
# appears in a msg, but distorting spamprob doesn't appear a correct way
# to exploit it.
def _add_msg(self, wordstream, is_spam):
self.probcache = {} # nuke the prob cache
if is_spam:
self.nspam += 1
else:
self.nham += 1
for word in set(wordstream):
record = self._wordinfoget(word)
if record is None:
record = self.WordInfoClass()
if is_spam:
record.spamcount += 1
else:
record.hamcount += 1
self._wordinfoset(word, record)
self._post_training()
def _remove_msg(self, wordstream, is_spam):
self.probcache = {} # nuke the prob cache
if is_spam:
if self.nspam <= 0:
raise ValueError("spam count would go negative!")
self.nspam -= 1
else:
if self.nham <= 0:
raise ValueError("non-spam count would go negative!")
self.nham -= 1
for word in set(wordstream):
record = self._wordinfoget(word)
if record is not None:
if is_spam:
if record.spamcount > 0:
record.spamcount -= 1
else:
if record.hamcount > 0:
record.hamcount -= 1
if record.hamcount == 0 == record.spamcount:
self._wordinfodel(word)
else:
self._wordinfoset(word, record)
self._post_training()
def _post_training(self):
"""This is called after training on a wordstream. Subclasses might
want to ensure that their databases are in a consistent state at
this point. Introduced to fix bug #797890."""
pass
# Return list of (prob, word, record) triples, sorted by increasing
# prob. "word" is a token from wordstream; "prob" is its spamprob (a
# float in 0.0 through 1.0); and "record" is word's associated
# WordInfo record if word is in the training database, or None if it's
# not. No more than max_discriminators items are returned, and have
# the strongest (farthest from 0.5) spamprobs of all tokens in wordstream.
# Tokens with spamprobs less than minimum_prob_strength away from 0.5
# aren't returned.
def _getclues(self, wordstream):
mindist = options["Classifier", "minimum_prob_strength"]
if options["Classifier", "use_bigrams"]:
# This scheme mixes single tokens with pairs of adjacent tokens.
# wordstream is "tiled" into non-overlapping unigrams and
# bigrams. Non-overlap is important to prevent a single original
# token from contributing to more than one spamprob returned
# (systematic correlation probably isn't a good thing).
# First fill list raw with
# (distance, prob, word, record), indices
# pairs, one for each unigram and bigram in wordstream.
# indices is a tuple containing the indices (0-based relative to
# the start of wordstream) of the tokens that went into word.
# indices is a 1-tuple for an original token, and a 2-tuple for
# a synthesized bigram token. The indices are needed to detect
# overlap later.
raw = []
push = raw.append
pair = None
# Keep track of which tokens we've already seen.
# Don't use a set here! This is an innermost loop, so speed is
# important here (direct dict fiddling is much quicker than
# invoking Python-level set methods; in Python 2.4 that will
# change).
seen = {pair: 1} # so the bigram token is skipped on 1st loop trip
for i, token in enumerate(wordstream):
if i: # not the 1st loop trip, so there is a preceding token
# This string interpolation must match the one in
# _enhance_wordstream().
pair = "bi:%s %s" % (last_token, token)
last_token = token
for clue, indices in (token, (i,)), (pair, (i-1, i)):
if clue not in seen: # as always, skip duplicates
seen[clue] = 1
tup = self._worddistanceget(clue)
if tup[0] >= mindist:
push((tup, indices))
# Sort raw, strongest to weakest spamprob.
raw.sort()
raw.reverse()
# Fill clues with the strongest non-overlapping clues.
clues = []
push = clues.append
# Keep track of which indices have already contributed to a
# clue in clues.
seen = {}
for tup, indices in raw:
overlap = [i for i in indices if i in seen]
if not overlap: # no overlap with anything already in clues
for i in indices:
seen[i] = 1
push(tup)
# Leave sorted from smallest to largest spamprob.
clues.reverse()
else:
# The all-unigram scheme just scores the tokens as-is. A set()
# is used to weed out duplicates at high speed.
clues = []
push = clues.append
for word in set(wordstream):
tup = self._worddistanceget(word)
if tup[0] >= mindist:
push(tup)
clues.sort()
if len(clues) > options["Classifier", "max_discriminators"]:
del clues[0 : -options["Classifier", "max_discriminators"]]
# Return (prob, word, record).
return [t[1:] for t in clues]
def _worddistanceget(self, word):
record = self._wordinfoget(word)
if record is None:
prob = options["Classifier", "unknown_word_prob"]
else:
prob = self.probability(record)
distance = abs(prob - 0.5)
return distance, prob, word, record
def _wordinfoget(self, word):
return self.wordinfo.get(word)
def _wordinfoset(self, word, record):
self.wordinfo[word] = record
def _wordinfodel(self, word):
del self.wordinfo[word]
def _enhance_wordstream(self, wordstream):
"""Add bigrams to the wordstream.
For example, a b c -> a b "a b" c "b c"
Note that these are *token* bigrams, and not *word* bigrams - i.e.
'synthetic' tokens get bigram'ed, too.
The bigram token is simply "bi:unigram1 unigram2" - a space should
be sufficient as a separator, since spaces aren't in any other
tokens, apart from 'synthetic' ones. The "bi:" prefix is added
to avoid conflict with tokens we generate (like "subject: word",
which could be "word" in a subject, or a bigram of "subject:" and
"word").
If the "Classifier":"use_bigrams" option is removed, this function
can be removed, too.
"""
last = None
for token in wordstream:
yield token
if last:
# This string interpolation must match the one in
# _getclues().
yield "bi:%s %s" % (last, token)
last = token
def _generate_slurp(self):
# We don't want to do this recursively and check URLs
# on webpages, so we have this little cheat.
if not hasattr(self, "setup_done"):
self.setup()
self.setup_done = True
if not hasattr(self, "do_slurp") or self.do_slurp:
if slurp_wordstream:
self.do_slurp = False
tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream)
self.do_slurp = True
self._save_caches()
return tokens
return []
def setup(self):
# Can't import this at the top because it's circular.
# XXX Someone smarter than me, please figure out the right
# XXX way to do this.
from spambayes.FileCorpus import ExpiryFileCorpus, FileMessageFactory
username = options["globals", "proxy_username"]
password = options["globals", "proxy_password"]
server = options["globals", "proxy_server"]
if server.find(":") != -1:
server, port = server.split(':', 1)
else:
port = 8080
if server:
# Build a new opener that uses a proxy requiring authorization
proxy_support = urllib2.ProxyHandler({"http" : \
"http://%s:%s@%s:%d" % \
(username, password,
server, port)})
opener = urllib2.build_opener(proxy_support,
urllib2.HTTPHandler)
else:
# Build a new opener without any proxy information.
opener = urllib2.build_opener(urllib2.HTTPHandler)
# Install it
urllib2.install_opener(opener)
# Setup the cache for retrieved urls
age = options["URLRetriever", "x-cache_expiry_days"]*24*60*60
dir = options["URLRetriever", "x-cache_directory"]
if not os.path.exists(dir):
# Create the directory.
if options["globals", "verbose"]:
print >> sys.stderr, "Creating URL cache directory"
os.makedirs(dir)
self.urlCorpus = ExpiryFileCorpus(age, FileMessageFactory(),
dir, cacheSize=20)
# Kill any old information in the cache
self.urlCorpus.removeExpiredMessages()
# Setup caches for unretrievable urls
self.bad_url_cache_name = os.path.join(dir, "bad_urls.pck")
self.http_error_cache_name = os.path.join(dir, "http_error_urls.pck")
if os.path.exists(self.bad_url_cache_name):
try:
self.bad_urls = pickle_read(self.bad_url_cache_name)
except (IOError, ValueError):
# Something went wrong loading it (bad pickle,
# probably). Start afresh.
if options["globals", "verbose"]:
print >> sys.stderr, "Bad URL pickle, using new."
self.bad_urls = {"url:non_resolving": (),
"url:non_html": (),
"url:unknown_error": ()}
else:
if options["globals", "verbose"]:
print "URL caches don't exist: creating"
self.bad_urls = {"url:non_resolving": (),
"url:non_html": (),
"url:unknown_error": ()}
if os.path.exists(self.http_error_cache_name):
try:
self.http_error_urls = pickle_read(self.http_error_cache_name)
except IOError, ValueError:
# Something went wrong loading it (bad pickle,
# probably). Start afresh.
if options["globals", "verbose"]:
print >> sys.stderr, "Bad HHTP error pickle, using new."
self.http_error_urls = {}
else:
self.http_error_urls = {}
def _save_caches(self):
# XXX Note that these caches are never refreshed, which might not
# XXX be a good thing long-term (if a previously invalid URL
# XXX becomes valid, for example).
for name, data in [(self.bad_url_cache_name, self.bad_urls),
(self.http_error_cache_name, self.http_error_urls),]:
pickle_write(name, data)
def slurp(self, proto, url):
# We generate these tokens:
# url:non_resolving
# url:non_html
# url:http_XXX (for each type of http error encounted,
# for example 404, 403, ...)
# And tokenise the received page (but we do not slurp this).
# Actually, the special url: tokens barely showed up in my testing,
# although I would have thought that they would more - this might
# be due to an error, although they do turn up on occasion. In
# any case, we have to do the test, so generating an extra token
# doesn't cost us anything apart from another entry in the db, and
# it's only two entries, plus one for each type of http error
# encountered, so it's pretty neglible.
# If there is no content in the URL, then just return immediately.
# "http://)" will trigger this.
if not url:
return ["url:non_resolving"]
from spambayes.tokenizer import Tokenizer
if options["URLRetriever", "x-only_slurp_base"]:
url = self._base_url(url)
# Check the unretrievable caches
for err in self.bad_urls.keys():
if url in self.bad_urls[err]:
return [err]
if self.http_error_urls.has_key(url):
return self.http_error_urls[url]
# We check if the url will resolve first
mo = DOMAIN_AND_PORT_RE.match(url)
domain = mo.group(1)
if mo.group(3) is None:
port = 80
else:
port = mo.group(3)
try:
_unused = socket.getaddrinfo(domain, port)
except socket.error:
self.bad_urls["url:non_resolving"] += (url,)
return ["url:non_resolving"]
# If the message is in our cache, then we can just skip over
# retrieving it from the network, and get it from there, instead.
url_key = URL_KEY_RE.sub('_', url)
cached_message = self.urlCorpus.get(url_key)
if cached_message is None:
# We're going to ignore everything that isn't text/html,
# so we might as well not bother retrieving anything with
# these extensions.
parts = url.split('.')
if parts[-1] in ('jpg', 'gif', 'png', 'css', 'js'):
self.bad_urls["url:non_html"] += (url,)
return ["url:non_html"]
# Waiting for the default timeout period slows everything
# down far too much, so try and reduce it for just this
# call (this will only work with Python 2.3 and above).
try:
timeout = socket.getdefaulttimeout()
socket.setdefaulttimeout(5)
except AttributeError:
# Probably Python 2.2.
pass
try:
if options["globals", "verbose"]:
print >> sys.stderr, "Slurping", url
f = urllib2.urlopen("%s://%s" % (proto, url))
except (urllib2.URLError, socket.error), details:
mo = HTTP_ERROR_RE.match(str(details))
if mo:
self.http_error_urls[url] = "url:http_" + mo.group(1)
return ["url:http_" + mo.group(1)]
self.bad_urls["url:unknown_error"] += (url,)
return ["url:unknown_error"]
# Restore the timeout
try:
socket.setdefaulttimeout(timeout)
except AttributeError:
# Probably Python 2.2.
pass
try:
# Anything that isn't text/html is ignored
content_type = f.info().get('content-type')
if content_type is None or \
not content_type.startswith("text/html"):
self.bad_urls["url:non_html"] += (url,)
return ["url:non_html"]
page = f.read()
headers = str(f.info())
f.close()
except socket.error:
# This is probably a temporary error, like a timeout.
# For now, just bail out.
return []
fake_message_string = headers + "\r\n" + page
# Retrieving the same messages over and over again will tire
# us out, so we store them in our own wee cache.
message = self.urlCorpus.makeMessage(url_key,
fake_message_string)
self.urlCorpus.addMessage(message)
else:
fake_message_string = cached_message.as_string()
msg = message_from_string(fake_message_string)
# We don't want to do full header tokenising, as this is
# optimised for messages, not webpages, so we just do the
# basic stuff.
bht = options["Tokenizer", "basic_header_tokenize"]
bhto = options["Tokenizer", "basic_header_tokenize_only"]
options["Tokenizer", "basic_header_tokenize"] = True
options["Tokenizer", "basic_header_tokenize_only"] = True
tokens = Tokenizer().tokenize(msg)
pf = options["URLRetriever", "x-web_prefix"]
tokens = ["%s%s" % (pf, tok) for tok in tokens]
# Undo the changes
options["Tokenizer", "basic_header_tokenize"] = bht
options["Tokenizer", "basic_header_tokenize_only"] = bhto
return tokens
def _base_url(self, url):
# To try and speed things up, and to avoid following
# unique URLS, we convert the URL to as basic a form
# as we can - so http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/index.html?you=me
# would become http://massey.ac.nz and http://id.example.com
# would become http://example.com
url += '/'
domain = url.split('/', 1)[0]
parts = domain.split('.')
if len(parts) > 2:
base_domain = parts[-2] + '.' + parts[-1]
if len(parts[-1]) < 3:
base_domain = parts[-3] + '.' + base_domain
else:
base_domain = domain
return base_domain
def _add_slurped(self, wordstream):
"""Add tokens generated by 'slurping' (i.e. tokenizing
the text at the web pages pointed to by URLs in messages)
to the wordstream."""
for token in wordstream:
yield token
slurped_tokens = self._generate_slurp()
for token in slurped_tokens:
yield token
def _wordinfokeys(self):
return self.wordinfo.keys()
Bayes = Classifier
|