/usr/share/doc/pythia8-doc/html/HadronLevelStandalone.html is in pythia8-doc-html 8.1.86-1.2.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 | <html>
<head>
<title>Hadron-Level Standalone</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="pythia.css"/>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="pythia32.gif"/>
</head>
<body>
<h2>Hadron-Level Standalone</h2>
The Les Houches Accord allows external process-level configurations
to be fed in, for subsequent parton-level and hadron-level generation
to be handled internally by PYTHIA. There is no correspondingly
standardized interface if you have external events that have also
been generated through the parton-level stage, so that only the
hadron-level remains to be handled. A non-standard way to achieve this
exists, however, and can be useful both for real applications and
for various tests of the hadronization model on its own.
<p/>
The key trick is to set the flag <code>ProcessLevel:all = off</code>.
When <code>pythia.next()</code> is called it then does not try to
generate a hard process. Since there are no beams, it is also not
possible to perform the normal <code>PartonLevel</code> step.
(It is still possible to generate final-state radiation, but this
is not automatic. It would have to be done by hand, using the
<code>pythia.forceTimeShower(...)</code> method, before
<code>pythia.next()</code> is called.)
Thus only the <code>HadronLevel</code> methods are
called, to take the current content of the event record stored in
<code>pythia.event</code> as a starting point for any hadronization
and decays that are allowed by the normal parameters of this step.
Often the input would consist solely of partons grouped into colour
singlets, but also (colour-singlet) particles are allowed.
<p/>
To set up all the parameters, a <code>pythia.init()</code> call has
to be used, without any arguments. In brief, the structure of the
main program therefore should be something like
<pre>
Pythia pythia; // Declare generator.
Event& event = pythia.event // Convenient shorthand.
pythia.readString("ProcessLevel:all = off"); // The trick!
pythia.init(); // Initialization.
for (int iEvent = 0; iEvent < nEvent; ++iEvent) {
// Insert filling of event here!
pythia.next(); // Do the hadron level.
}
</pre>
Of course this should be supplemented by analysis of events, error checks,
and so on, as for a normal PYTHIA run. The unique aspect is how to fill
the <code>event</code> inside the loop, before <code>pythia.next()</code>
is called.
<h3>Input configuration</h3>
To set up a new configuration the first step is to throw away the current
one, with <code>event.reset()</code>. This routine will also reserve
the zeroth entry in the even record to represent the event as a whole.
<p/>
With the <code>event.append(...)</code> methods a new entry is added at the
bottom of the current record, i.e. the first time it is called entry
number 1 is filled, and so on. The <code>append</code> method basically
exists in four variants, either without or with history information,
and with four-momentum provided either as a <code>Vec4</code> four-vector
or as four individual components:
<pre>
append( id, status, col, acol, p, m)
append( id, status, col, acol, px, py, pz, e, m)
append( id, status, mother1, mother2, daughter1, daughter2, col, acol, p, m)
append( id, status, mother1, mother2, daughter1, daughter2, col, acol, px, py, pz, e, m)
</pre>
The methods return the index at which the entry has been stored,
but normally you would not use this feature.
<p/>
You can find descriptions of the input variables
<a href="ParticleProperties.html" target="page">here</a>.
The PDG particle code <code>id</code> and the Les Houches Accord colour
<code>col</code> and anticolour <code>acol</code> tags must be set
correctly. The four-momentum and mass have to be provided in units of GeV;
if you omit the mass it defaults to 0.
<p/>
Outgoing particles that should hadronize should be given status code 23.
Often this is the only status code you need. You could e.g. also fill in
incoming partons with -21 and intermediate ones with -22, if you so wish.
Usually the choice of status codes is not crucial, so long as you recall
that positive numbers correspond to particles that are still around, while
negative numbers denote ones that already hadronized or decayed. However,
so as not to run into contradictions with the internal PYTHIA checks
(when <code>Check:event = on</code>), or with external formats such as
HepMC, we do recommend the above codes. When <code>pythia.next()</code>
is called the positive-status particles that hadronize/decay get the sign
of the status code flipped to negative but the absolute value is retained.
The new particles are added with normal PYTHIA status codes.
<p/>
For normal hadronization/decays in <code>pythia.next()</code> the
history encoded in the mother and daughter indices is not used.
Therefore the first two <code>append</code> methods, which set all these
indices vanishing, should suffice. The subsequent hadronization/decays
will still be properly documented.
<p/>
The exception is when you want to include junctions in your string
topology, i.e. have three string pieces meet. Then you must insert in
your event record the (decayed) particle that is the reason for the
presence of a junction, e.g. a baryon beam remnant from which several
valence quarks have been kicked out, or a neutralino that underwent a
baryon-number-violating decay. This particle must have as daughters
the three partons that together carry the baryon number.
<p/>
The sample program in <code>main21.cc</code> illustrates how you can work
with this facility, both for simple parton configurations and for more
complicated ones with junctions.
<p/>
As an alternative to setting up a topology with the methods above,
a <a href="LesHouchesAccord.html" target="page">Les Houches Event File</a> (LHEF)
can also provide the configurations, using the "no-beams" extension.
For parsing reasons the <code><init></code> and
<code></init></code> tags need to be present as two separate
lines, but there need not be anything between them. If there is,
then the beam identities should be picked to be 0. A standard
<code><LesHouchesEvents version="1.0"></code> line must also
be at the top of the file. For the rest only the
<code><event>....</event></code> blocks need to be present,
one for each event. You should select <code>Beams:frameType = 4</code>
and provide the file name in <code>Beams:LHEF</code>, but setting
<code>ProcessLevel:all = off</code> here is superfluous since the
absence of beams is enough to make this apparent. Needless to say, an
externally linked <code>LHAup</code> class works as well as an LHEF,
with <code>Beams:frameType = 5</code>.
<p/>
The event information to store in the LHEF, or provide by the
<code>LHAup</code>, is essentially the same as above. The only
difference is in status codes: outgoing particles should have 1
instead of 23, and intermediate resonances 2 instead of -22.
Incoming partons, if any, are -1 instead of -21.
<h3>Extensions to resonance decays</h3>
With the above scheme, <code>pythia.next()</code> will generate
hadronization, i.e. string fragmentation and subsequent decays of
normal unstable particles. Alternatively it could be used to
decay <a href="ResonanceDecays.html" target="page">resonances</a>, i.e.
<i>W, Z</i>, top, Higgs, SUSY and other massive particles.
<p/>
The default when a resonance is encountered is to decay it, let the
decay products shower, and finally hadronize the partons. Should a
decay sequence already be provided at input, this sequence will
be used as input for the showers, which are handled consecutively,
followed by hadronization. Thus, a Higgs could be provided alone,
or decaying to a pair of <i>W</i> bosons, or the same with the
<i>W</i>'s decaying further to fermion pairs. Needless to say,
correct process-specific angular correlations in decays should not
be expected when the process is unspecified.
<p/>
If you do not want resonances to decay then you can use the
<code>ProcessLevel:resonanceDecays = off</code> setting.
If instead you want them to decay but not shower, you can
use either <code>PartonLevel:FSR = off</code> or
<code>PartonLevel:FSRinResonances = off</code>. A warning here
is that, generally, it is not a good idea to provide a part of the
shower history but not all, e.g. <i> Z^0 → q qbar g</i>:
it is not straightforward to avoid doublecouning or other problems
within this simpler alternative to a full-scale event generation.
<p/>
The input configuration has to follow the rules described above,
i.e. <code>ProcessLevel:all = off</code> should be set for internal
input, but is not necessary for LHEF input. It is possible to combine
several resonances, and other coloured or uncoloured particles into
the same event. Partonic daughters of resonances would then shower,
but other partons not. It may be possible to fool the program,
however, since this is not a fully tested core functionality,
so don't combine wildly if there is no reason to.
<h3>Repeated hadronization or decay</h3>
An alternative approach is possible with the
<code>pythia.forceHadronLevel()</code> routine. This method does
a call to the <code>HadronLevel</code> methods, irrespective of the
value of the <code>HadronLevel:all</code> flag. If you hadronize
externally generated events it is equivalent to a
<code>pythia.next()</code> call with
<code>ProcessLevel:all = off</code>.
<p/>
This method truly sticks to the hadron level, and thus cannot handle
resonance decays.
<p/>
The similarity of names indicates that
<code>pythia.forceTimeShower( int iBeg, int iEnd, double pTmax,
int nBranchMax = 0)</code> is intended to belong to the same set of
work-by-hand methods. Here <code>iBeg</code> and <code>iEnd</code>
give the range of partons that should be allowed to shower,
<code>pTmax</code> the maximum <i>pT</i> scale of emissions,
and a nonzero <code>nBranchMax</code> a maximum number of allowed
branchings. Additionally, a <code>scale</code> has to be set for each
parton that should shower, which requires an additional final argument
to the <code>append</code> methods above. This scale limits the maximum
<i>pT</i> allowed for each parton, in addition to the global
<code>pTmax</code>. When not set the scale defaults to 0, meaning no
radiation for that parton.
<p/>
The real application instead is for repeated hadronization of the same
PYTHIA process- and parton-level event. This may for some studies
help to save time, given that these two first step are more
time-consuming than the hadronization one.
<p/>
For repeated hadronization you should first generate an event as usual,
but with <code>HadronLevel:all = off</code>. This event you can save
in a temporary copy, e.g. <code>Event savedEvent = pythia.event</code>.
Inside a loop you copy back with <code>pythia.event = savedEvent</code>,
and call <code>pythia.forceHadronLevel()</code> to obtain a new
hadronization history.
<p/>
A more limited form of repetition is if you want to decay a given kind
of particle repeatedly, without having to generate the rest of the event
anew. This could be the case e.g. in <i>B</i> physics applications.
Then you can use the <code>pythia.moreDecays()</code> method, which
decays all particles in the event record that have not been decayed
but should have been done so. The
<code>pythia.particleData.mayDecay( id, false/true)</code> method
may be used to switch off/on the decays of a particle species
<code>id</code>, so that it is not decayed in the
<code>pythia.next()</code> call but only inside a loop over a number of
tries.
<p/>
Between each loop the newly produced decay products must be
removed and the decayed particle status restored to undecayed.
The former is simple, since the new products are appended to the
end of the event record: <code>event.saveSize()</code> saves the
initial size of the event record, and <code>event.restoreSize()</code>
can later be used repeatedly to restore this original size, which means
that the new particles at the end are thrown away. The latter is more
complicated, and requires the user to identify the positions of all
particles of the species and restore a positive status code with
<code>event[i].statusPos()</code>.
<p/>
The <code>main15.cc</code> program illustrates both these methods,
i.e. either repeated hadronization or repeated decay of PYTHIA
events.
</body>
</html>
<!-- Copyright (C) 2014 Torbjorn Sjostrand -->
|