This file is indexed.

/usr/share/perl/5.22.1/meta_notation.pm is in perl-modules-5.22 5.22.1-9.

This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.

The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
use strict;
use warnings;

# A tiny private library routine which is a helper to several Perl core
# modules, to allow a paradigm to be implemented in a single place.  The name,
# contents, or even the existence of this file may be changed at any time and
# are NOT to be used by anthing outside the Perl core.

sub _meta_notation ($) {

    # Returns a copy of the input string with the nonprintable characters
    # below 0x100 changed into printables.  Any ASCII printables or above 0xFF
    # are unchanged.  (XXX Probably above-Latin1 characters should be
    # converted to \X{...})
    #
    # \0 .. \x1F (which are "\c@" .. "\c_") are changed into ^@, ^A, ^B, ...
    # ^Z, ^[, ^\, ^], ^^, ^_
    # \c? is changed into ^?.
    #
    # The above accounts for all the ASCII-range nonprintables.
    #
    # On ASCII platforms, the upper-Latin1-range characters are converted to
    # Meta notation, so that \xC1 becomes 'M-A', \xE2 becomes 'M-b', etc.
    # This is how it always has worked, so is continued that way for backwards
    # compatibility.  XXX Wrong, but the way it has always worked is that \x80
    # .. \x9F are converted to M- followed by a literal control char.  This
    # probably has escaped attention due to the limited domains this code has
    # been applied to.  ext/SDBM_File/dbu.c does this right.
    #
    # On EBCDIC platforms, the upper-Latin1-range characters are converted
    # into '\x{...}'  Meta notation doesn't make sense on EBCDIC platforms
    # because the ASCII-range printables are a mixture of upper bit set or
    # not.  [A-Za-Z0-9] all have the upper bit set.  The underscore likely
    # doesn't; and other punctuation may or may not.  There's no simple
    # pattern.

    my $string = shift;

    $string =~ s/([\0-\037])/
               sprintf("^%c",utf8::unicode_to_native(ord($1)^64))/xeg;
    $string =~ s/\c?/^?/g;
    if (ord("A") == 65) {
        $string =~ s/([\200-\377])/sprintf("M-%c",ord($1)&0177)/eg;
    }
    else {
        no warnings 'experimental::regex_sets';
        # Leave alone things above \xff
        $string =~ s/( (?[ [\x00-\xFF] & [:^print:]])) /
                  sprintf("\\x{%X}", ord($1))/xaeg;
    }

    return $string;
}
1