This file is indexed.

/usr/share/acl2-6.3/books/misc/bash.cert is in acl2-books-certs 6.3-5.

This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.

The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
(IN-PACKAGE "ACL2")
"ACL2 Version 6.3"
:BEGIN-PORTCULLIS-CMDS
(DEFPKG "XDOC" (SET-DIFFERENCE-EQ (UNION-EQ (UNION-EQ *ACL2-EXPORTS* *COMMON-LISP-SYMBOLS-FROM-MAIN-LISP-PACKAGE*) (QUOTE (B* QUIT EXIT VALUE DEFXDOC DEFXDOC-RAW MACRO-ARGS XDOC-EXTEND DEFSECTION DEFSECTION-PROGN CUTIL LNFIX SET-DEFAULT-PARENTS GETPROP FORMALS JUSTIFICATION DEF-BODIES CURRENT-ACL2-WORLD DEF-BODY ACCESS THEOREM UNTRANSLATED-THEOREM GUARD XDOC XDOC! UNQUOTE UNDOCUMENTED ASSERT! TOP EXPLODE IMPLODE))) (QUOTE NIL)) NIL ((:SYSTEM . "xdoc/portcullis.lisp") (:SYSTEM . "xdoc/top.lisp")) T)
:END-PORTCULLIS-CMDS
:EXPANSION-ALIST
((3 RECORD-EXPANSION (DEFXDOC BASH :PARENTS (PROOF-AUTOMATION) :SHORT "

<tt>Bash</tt> is a tool that simplifies a term, producing a list of
simplified terms such that if all output terms are theorems, then so is the
input term." :LONG "

<p>This utility is defined in community book <tt>\"misc/bash.lisp\"</tt>.  If
you submit <tt>(bash term)</tt> then roughly speaking, the result is a list of
goals produced by ACL2's simplification process.  That is, ACL2 might
reasonably be expected to produce these goals when simplifying <tt>term</tt>
during a proof attempt.  In particular, if the result is <tt>nil</tt>, then
<tt>term</tt> is a theorem.  More accurately: <tt>(bash term)</tt> returns an
<see topic=\"@(url ERROR-TRIPLES)\">error triple</see>, <tt>(mv nil val
state)</tt>, where <tt>val</tt> is a list of terms, in
untranslated (user-level) form, whose provability implies the provability of
the input term.  If ACL2 cannot simplify the input term (e.g., if there is a
translation error), then it prints a warning and returns <tt>(mv nil input-term
state)</tt>.</p>

<p>For a related utility, see @(see bash-term-to-dnf).</p>

<h3>Examples</h3>

<p>First we execute:
@({(include-book \"misc/bash\" :dir :system)})
Then:
@({
ACL2 !>(bash (equal (append x y) (append (car (cons x a)) z)))
Goal'
 ((EQUAL (APPEND X Y) (APPEND X Z)))
ACL2 !>(set-gag-mode nil) ; optional; turns off printing of goal names
<state>
ACL2 !>(bash (equal (append x y) (append (car (cons x a)) z)))
 ((EQUAL (APPEND X Y) (APPEND X Z)))
ACL2 !>(bash (equal (car (cons x y)) x))
 NIL
ACL2 !>(bash (implies (true-listp x) (equal (append x y) zzz))
             :hints ((\"Goal\" :expand ((true-listp x)
                                      (true-listp (cdr x))
                                      (append x y)))))
 ((EQUAL Y ZZZ)
  (IMPLIES (AND (CONSP X)
                (CONSP (CDR X))
                (TRUE-LISTP (CDDR X)))
           (EQUAL (LIST* (CAR X)
                         (CADR X)
                         (APPEND (CDDR X) Y))
                  ZZZ))
  (IMPLIES (AND (CONSP X) (NOT (CDR X)))
           (EQUAL (CONS (CAR X) Y) ZZZ)))
ACL2 !>(bash (equal x y))

ACL2 Warning [bash] in BASH:  Unable to simplify the input term.

 ((EQUAL X Y))
ACL2 !>(bash (equal x))

ACL2 Warning [bash] in BASH:  Unable to simplify the input term because
an error occurred.  Try setting the verbose flag to t in order to see
what is going on.

 ((EQUAL X))
ACL2 !>(bash (equal x) :verbose t)


ACL2 Error in BASH:  EQUAL takes 2 arguments but in the call (EQUAL X)
it is given 1 argument.   The formal parameters list for EQUAL is (X Y).


ACL2 Warning [bash] in BASH:  Unable to simplify the input term because
an error occurred.

 ((EQUAL X))
ACL2 !>
})</p>

<p>Here is how we might use this tool to simplify hypotheses.  First execute:

@({
 (defstub p1 (x) t)
 (defstub p2 (x) t)
 (defun p3 (x) (if (atom x) (p2 x) (p1 (car x))))
 (include-book
  \"misc/bash\" :dir :system)
})

Then:

@({
  ACL2 !>(bash (implies (and (p1 x) (p3 x))
                        (hide aaa)))
   ((IMPLIES (AND (P1 X) (CONSP X) (P1 (CAR X)))
             (HIDE AAA))
    (IMPLIES (AND (P1 X) (NOT (CONSP X)) (P2 X))
             (HIDE AAA)))
  ACL2 !>
})</p>

<h3>More details</h3>

<p>This utility is similar to the @(see proof-checker)'s <tt>bash</tt> command,
but for use in the top-level loop.  The input term can have user-level syntax;
it need not be translated.  The output is an error triple <tt>(mv nil termlist
state)</tt> such that either <tt>termlist</tt> is a one-element list containing
the input term, or else <tt>termlist</tt> is a list of term such that if each
term in this list is a theorem, then the input term is a theorem.  In practice,
these terms are produced by calling the prover with non-simplification
processes --- <tt>generalize</tt>, <tt>eliminate-destructors</tt>,
<tt>fertilize</tt> (heuristic use of equalities), and
<tt>eliminate-irrelevance</tt>, as well as induction --- turned off, and with
forcing rounds skipped (at least the first 15 of them).  A keyword argument,
<tt>:hints</tt>, can specify @(see hints) using their usual syntax, as with
@(see defthm).  The other keyword argument, <tt>:verbose</tt>, is <tt>nil</tt>
by default, to suppress output; use a non-<tt>nil</tt> value if you want
output, including the proof attempt.  The keyword values are not evaluated, so
for example <tt>:hints</tt> could be of the form <tt>((\"Goal\" ...))</tt> but
not <tt>'((\"Goal\" ...))</tt>.</p>

<p>We conclude with an note on the use of @(see hints) that may be important if
you use computed hints (see @(see computed-hints)).  Consider the following
example, supplied courtesy of Harsh Raju Chamarthi.

@({
 (defun drop (n l)
   (if (zp n)
     l
     (drop (1- n) (cdr l))))

 (include-book \"misc/bash\" :dir :system)

 ; Occur-fn returns the term that has fn has its function symbol.
 (mutual-recursion
  (defun occur-fn (fn term2)
    (cond ((variablep term2) nil)
          ((fquotep term2) nil)
          (t (or (and (eq fn (ffn-symb term2)) term2)
                 (occur-fn-lst fn (fargs term2))))))
  (defun occur-fn-lst (fn args2)
    (cond ((endp args2) nil)
          (t (or (occur-fn fn (car args2))
                 (occur-fn-lst fn (cdr args2)))))))

 ; Doesn't work as you might expect (see below):
 (bash (drop 3 x)
       :verbose t
       :hints ((if (occur-fn-lst 'drop clause)
                   `(:computed-hint-replacement
                     t
                     :expand
                     (,(occur-fn-lst 'drop clause)))
                 nil)))
})

The preceding call of <tt>bash</tt>, at the end of the displayed list of forms
above, causes the theorem prover to use destructor elimination, even though
that proof process is presumably turned off by <tt>bash</tt>.  What happened?
The problem is that the user-supplied hints are put in front of the hints
generated by <tt>bash</tt> to form the full list of hints given to the prover,
which cases the <tt>:do-not</tt> hint on \"Goal\" to be ignored.  Here is a
solution.

@({
 (bash (drop 3 x)
       :verbose t
       :hints ((if (occur-fn-lst 'drop clause)
                   `(:computed-hint-replacement
                     t
                     :do-not-induct :bash
                     :do-not (set-difference-eq *do-not-processes*
                                                '(preprocess simplify))
                     :expand (,(occur-fn-lst 'drop clause)))
                 '(:do-not-induct
                   :bash
                   :do-not
                   (set-difference-eq *do-not-processes*
                                      '(preprocess simplify))))))
})</p>") (WITH-OUTPUT :OFF (EVENT SUMMARY) (PROGN (TABLE XDOC (QUOTE DOC) (CONS (QUOTE ((:NAME . BASH) (:BASE-PKG . ACL2-PKG-WITNESS) (:PARENTS PROOF-AUTOMATION) (:SHORT . "

<tt>Bash</tt> is a tool that simplifies a term, producing a list of
simplified terms such that if all output terms are theorems, then so is the
input term.") (:LONG . "

<p>This utility is defined in community book <tt>\"misc/bash.lisp\"</tt>.  If
you submit <tt>(bash term)</tt> then roughly speaking, the result is a list of
goals produced by ACL2's simplification process.  That is, ACL2 might
reasonably be expected to produce these goals when simplifying <tt>term</tt>
during a proof attempt.  In particular, if the result is <tt>nil</tt>, then
<tt>term</tt> is a theorem.  More accurately: <tt>(bash term)</tt> returns an
<see topic=\"@(url ERROR-TRIPLES)\">error triple</see>, <tt>(mv nil val
state)</tt>, where <tt>val</tt> is a list of terms, in
untranslated (user-level) form, whose provability implies the provability of
the input term.  If ACL2 cannot simplify the input term (e.g., if there is a
translation error), then it prints a warning and returns <tt>(mv nil input-term
state)</tt>.</p>

<p>For a related utility, see @(see bash-term-to-dnf).</p>

<h3>Examples</h3>

<p>First we execute:
@({(include-book \"misc/bash\" :dir :system)})
Then:
@({
ACL2 !>(bash (equal (append x y) (append (car (cons x a)) z)))
Goal'
 ((EQUAL (APPEND X Y) (APPEND X Z)))
ACL2 !>(set-gag-mode nil) ; optional; turns off printing of goal names
<state>
ACL2 !>(bash (equal (append x y) (append (car (cons x a)) z)))
 ((EQUAL (APPEND X Y) (APPEND X Z)))
ACL2 !>(bash (equal (car (cons x y)) x))
 NIL
ACL2 !>(bash (implies (true-listp x) (equal (append x y) zzz))
             :hints ((\"Goal\" :expand ((true-listp x)
                                      (true-listp (cdr x))
                                      (append x y)))))
 ((EQUAL Y ZZZ)
  (IMPLIES (AND (CONSP X)
                (CONSP (CDR X))
                (TRUE-LISTP (CDDR X)))
           (EQUAL (LIST* (CAR X)
                         (CADR X)
                         (APPEND (CDDR X) Y))
                  ZZZ))
  (IMPLIES (AND (CONSP X) (NOT (CDR X)))
           (EQUAL (CONS (CAR X) Y) ZZZ)))
ACL2 !>(bash (equal x y))

ACL2 Warning [bash] in BASH:  Unable to simplify the input term.

 ((EQUAL X Y))
ACL2 !>(bash (equal x))

ACL2 Warning [bash] in BASH:  Unable to simplify the input term because
an error occurred.  Try setting the verbose flag to t in order to see
what is going on.

 ((EQUAL X))
ACL2 !>(bash (equal x) :verbose t)


ACL2 Error in BASH:  EQUAL takes 2 arguments but in the call (EQUAL X)
it is given 1 argument.   The formal parameters list for EQUAL is (X Y).


ACL2 Warning [bash] in BASH:  Unable to simplify the input term because
an error occurred.

 ((EQUAL X))
ACL2 !>
})</p>

<p>Here is how we might use this tool to simplify hypotheses.  First execute:

@({
 (defstub p1 (x) t)
 (defstub p2 (x) t)
 (defun p3 (x) (if (atom x) (p2 x) (p1 (car x))))
 (include-book
  \"misc/bash\" :dir :system)
})

Then:

@({
  ACL2 !>(bash (implies (and (p1 x) (p3 x))
                        (hide aaa)))
   ((IMPLIES (AND (P1 X) (CONSP X) (P1 (CAR X)))
             (HIDE AAA))
    (IMPLIES (AND (P1 X) (NOT (CONSP X)) (P2 X))
             (HIDE AAA)))
  ACL2 !>
})</p>

<h3>More details</h3>

<p>This utility is similar to the @(see proof-checker)'s <tt>bash</tt> command,
but for use in the top-level loop.  The input term can have user-level syntax;
it need not be translated.  The output is an error triple <tt>(mv nil termlist
state)</tt> such that either <tt>termlist</tt> is a one-element list containing
the input term, or else <tt>termlist</tt> is a list of term such that if each
term in this list is a theorem, then the input term is a theorem.  In practice,
these terms are produced by calling the prover with non-simplification
processes --- <tt>generalize</tt>, <tt>eliminate-destructors</tt>,
<tt>fertilize</tt> (heuristic use of equalities), and
<tt>eliminate-irrelevance</tt>, as well as induction --- turned off, and with
forcing rounds skipped (at least the first 15 of them).  A keyword argument,
<tt>:hints</tt>, can specify @(see hints) using their usual syntax, as with
@(see defthm).  The other keyword argument, <tt>:verbose</tt>, is <tt>nil</tt>
by default, to suppress output; use a non-<tt>nil</tt> value if you want
output, including the proof attempt.  The keyword values are not evaluated, so
for example <tt>:hints</tt> could be of the form <tt>((\"Goal\" ...))</tt> but
not <tt>'((\"Goal\" ...))</tt>.</p>

<p>We conclude with an note on the use of @(see hints) that may be important if
you use computed hints (see @(see computed-hints)).  Consider the following
example, supplied courtesy of Harsh Raju Chamarthi.

@({
 (defun drop (n l)
   (if (zp n)
     l
     (drop (1- n) (cdr l))))

 (include-book \"misc/bash\" :dir :system)

 ; Occur-fn returns the term that has fn has its function symbol.
 (mutual-recursion
  (defun occur-fn (fn term2)
    (cond ((variablep term2) nil)
          ((fquotep term2) nil)
          (t (or (and (eq fn (ffn-symb term2)) term2)
                 (occur-fn-lst fn (fargs term2))))))
  (defun occur-fn-lst (fn args2)
    (cond ((endp args2) nil)
          (t (or (occur-fn fn (car args2))
                 (occur-fn-lst fn (cdr args2)))))))

 ; Doesn't work as you might expect (see below):
 (bash (drop 3 x)
       :verbose t
       :hints ((if (occur-fn-lst 'drop clause)
                   `(:computed-hint-replacement
                     t
                     :expand
                     (,(occur-fn-lst 'drop clause)))
                 nil)))
})

The preceding call of <tt>bash</tt>, at the end of the displayed list of forms
above, causes the theorem prover to use destructor elimination, even though
that proof process is presumably turned off by <tt>bash</tt>.  What happened?
The problem is that the user-supplied hints are put in front of the hints
generated by <tt>bash</tt> to form the full list of hints given to the prover,
which cases the <tt>:do-not</tt> hint on \"Goal\" to be ignored.  Here is a
solution.

@({
 (bash (drop 3 x)
       :verbose t
       :hints ((if (occur-fn-lst 'drop clause)
                   `(:computed-hint-replacement
                     t
                     :do-not-induct :bash
                     :do-not (set-difference-eq *do-not-processes*
                                                '(preprocess simplify))
                     :expand (,(occur-fn-lst 'drop clause)))
                 '(:do-not-induct
                   :bash
                   :do-not
                   (set-difference-eq *do-not-processes*
                                      '(preprocess simplify))))))
})</p>") (:FROM . "[books]/misc/bash.lisp"))) (XDOC::GET-XDOC-TABLE WORLD))) (VALUE-TRIPLE (QUOTE (DEFXDOC BASH)))))) (4 RECORD-EXPANSION (DEFXDOC BASH-TERM-TO-DNF :PARENTS (PROOF-AUTOMATION) :SHORT "

<tt>Bash-term-to-dnf</tt> is a tool that simplifies a term, producing a list of
clauses such that if all output clauses are theorems, then so is the input
term." :LONG "

<p>This utility is defined in community book <tt>\"misc/bash.lisp\"</tt>.  We
assume here familiarity with the @('bash') tool defined in that book, focusing
below on how the present tool differs from that one.</p>

<p>If you submit <tt>(bash-term-to-dnf term)</tt> then the result is a list of
goals produced by ACL2's simplification process, much as for the result of
<tt>(bash term)</tt>; see @('bash').  However, unlike <tt>bash</tt>,
<tt>bash-term-to-dnf</tt> returns a list of <i>clauses</i>, where each clause
is a list of terms that represents the disjunction of those terms, and the list
of clauses is implicitly conjoined.</p>

<p>Again: For a related utility, see @('bash').</p>

<h3>Example</h3>

<p>First we execute:
@({(include-book \"misc/bash\" :dir :system)})
Then:
@({
ACL2 !>(bash-term-to-dnf
        '(implies (true-listp x) (equal (append x y) zzz))
        '((\"Goal\" :expand ((true-listp x)
                           (true-listp (cdr x))
                           (append x y))))
        nil t state)
 (((EQUAL Y ZZZ))
  ((NOT (CONSP X))
   (NOT (CONSP (CDR X)))
   (NOT (TRUE-LISTP (CDDR X)))
   (EQUAL (LIST* (CAR X)
                 (CADR X)
                 (APPEND (CDDR X) Y))
          ZZZ))
  ((NOT (CONSP X))
   (CDR X)
   (EQUAL (CONS (CAR X) Y) ZZZ)))
ACL2 !>
})</p>

<h3>General Form:</h3>

<p>@({(bash-term-to-dnf form hints verbose untranslate-flg state)})
returns a list of clauses, each of which is a list of terms, where:

<ul>

<li><tt>form</tt> is a user-level (untranslated) term;</li>

<li><tt>hints</tt>, if supplied, is a @(see hints) structure (as for
@('defthm'));</li>

<li><tt>verbose</tt> is <tt>nil</tt> by default, in which case output is
inhibited; on the other extreme, if <tt>verbose</tt> is <tt>:all</tt> then a
warning is printed when no simplification takes place; and</li>

<li><tt>untranslate-flg</tt> is <tt>nil</tt> by default, in which case each
term in each returned clause is a term in internal (translated) form and
otherwise, each such term is in user-level (untranslated) form;</li>

</ul>

If each returned clause (viewed as a disjunction) is a theorem, then the input
<tt>form</tt> is a theorem.</p>") (WITH-OUTPUT :OFF (EVENT SUMMARY) (PROGN (TABLE XDOC (QUOTE DOC) (CONS (QUOTE ((:NAME . BASH-TERM-TO-DNF) (:BASE-PKG . ACL2-PKG-WITNESS) (:PARENTS PROOF-AUTOMATION) (:SHORT . "

<tt>Bash-term-to-dnf</tt> is a tool that simplifies a term, producing a list of
clauses such that if all output clauses are theorems, then so is the input
term.") (:LONG . "

<p>This utility is defined in community book <tt>\"misc/bash.lisp\"</tt>.  We
assume here familiarity with the @('bash') tool defined in that book, focusing
below on how the present tool differs from that one.</p>

<p>If you submit <tt>(bash-term-to-dnf term)</tt> then the result is a list of
goals produced by ACL2's simplification process, much as for the result of
<tt>(bash term)</tt>; see @('bash').  However, unlike <tt>bash</tt>,
<tt>bash-term-to-dnf</tt> returns a list of <i>clauses</i>, where each clause
is a list of terms that represents the disjunction of those terms, and the list
of clauses is implicitly conjoined.</p>

<p>Again: For a related utility, see @('bash').</p>

<h3>Example</h3>

<p>First we execute:
@({(include-book \"misc/bash\" :dir :system)})
Then:
@({
ACL2 !>(bash-term-to-dnf
        '(implies (true-listp x) (equal (append x y) zzz))
        '((\"Goal\" :expand ((true-listp x)
                           (true-listp (cdr x))
                           (append x y))))
        nil t state)
 (((EQUAL Y ZZZ))
  ((NOT (CONSP X))
   (NOT (CONSP (CDR X)))
   (NOT (TRUE-LISTP (CDDR X)))
   (EQUAL (LIST* (CAR X)
                 (CADR X)
                 (APPEND (CDDR X) Y))
          ZZZ))
  ((NOT (CONSP X))
   (CDR X)
   (EQUAL (CONS (CAR X) Y) ZZZ)))
ACL2 !>
})</p>

<h3>General Form:</h3>

<p>@({(bash-term-to-dnf form hints verbose untranslate-flg state)})
returns a list of clauses, each of which is a list of terms, where:

<ul>

<li><tt>form</tt> is a user-level (untranslated) term;</li>

<li><tt>hints</tt>, if supplied, is a @(see hints) structure (as for
@('defthm'));</li>

<li><tt>verbose</tt> is <tt>nil</tt> by default, in which case output is
inhibited; on the other extreme, if <tt>verbose</tt> is <tt>:all</tt> then a
warning is printed when no simplification takes place; and</li>

<li><tt>untranslate-flg</tt> is <tt>nil</tt> by default, in which case each
term in each returned clause is a term in internal (translated) form and
otherwise, each such term is in user-level (untranslated) form;</li>

</ul>

If each returned clause (viewed as a disjunction) is a theorem, then the input
<tt>form</tt> is a theorem.</p>") (:FROM . "[books]/misc/bash.lisp"))) (XDOC::GET-XDOC-TABLE WORLD))) (VALUE-TRIPLE (QUOTE (DEFXDOC BASH-TERM-TO-DNF)))))))
NIL
(("/usr/share/acl2-6.3/books/misc/bash.lisp" "bash" "bash" ((:SKIPPED-PROOFSP) (:AXIOMSP) (:TTAGS)) . 2072788782) ("/usr/share/acl2-6.3/books/misc/bash-bsd.lisp" "bash-bsd" "bash-bsd" ((:SKIPPED-PROOFSP) (:AXIOMSP) (:TTAGS)) . 2012399176) ("/usr/share/acl2-6.3/books/xdoc/top.lisp" "xdoc/top" "top" ((:SKIPPED-PROOFSP) (:AXIOMSP) (:TTAGS)) . 1214825095) ("/usr/share/acl2-6.3/books/xdoc/book-thms.lisp" "book-thms" "book-thms" ((:SKIPPED-PROOFSP) (:AXIOMSP) (:TTAGS)) . 1105796063) ("/usr/share/acl2-6.3/books/xdoc/base.lisp" "base" "base" ((:SKIPPED-PROOFSP) (:AXIOMSP) (:TTAGS)) . 454271148) ("/usr/share/acl2-6.3/books/xdoc/portcullis.lisp" "portcullis" "portcullis" ((:SKIPPED-PROOFSP) (:AXIOMSP) (:TTAGS)) . 1473208573))
4541177