This file is indexed.

/usr/share/pyshared/zope/securitypolicy/zopepolicy.txt is in python-zope.securitypolicy 3.7.0-0ubuntu4.

This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.

The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
============================
Classic Zope Security Policy
============================

This package implements a role-based security policy similar to the
policy found in Zope 2.  The security policy is responsible for
deciding whether an interaction has a permission on an object.  This
security policy does this using grant and denial information.  Managers
can grant or deny:

  - roles to principals,

  - permissions to principals, and

  - permissions to roles

Grants and denials are stored as annotations on objects.  To store
grants and denials, objects must be annotatable:

  >>> import zope.interface
  >>> from zope.annotation.interfaces import IAttributeAnnotatable
  >>> class Ob:
  ...     zope.interface.implements(IAttributeAnnotatable)

  >>> ob = Ob()

We use objects to represent principals.  These objects implement an
interface named `IPrincipal`, but the security policy only uses the `id`
and `groups` attributes:

  >>> class Principal:
  ...     def __init__(self, id):
  ...         self.id = id
  ...         self.groups = []

  >>> principal = Principal('bob')

Roles and permissions are also represented by objects, however, for
the purposes of the security policy, only string `ids` are used.

The security policy provides a factory for creating interactions:

  >>> import zope.securitypolicy.zopepolicy
  >>> interaction = zope.securitypolicy.zopepolicy.ZopeSecurityPolicy()

An interaction represents a specific interaction between some
principals (normally users) and the system.  Normally, we are only
concerned with the interaction of one principal with the system, although
we can have interactions of multiple principals.  Multiple-principal
interactions normally occur when untrusted users store code on a
system for later execution.  When untrusted code is executing, the
authors of the code participate in the interaction.  An
interaction has a permission on an object only if all of the
principals participating in the interaction have access to the object.

The `checkPermission` method on interactions is used to test whether
an interaction has a permission for an object.  An interaction without
participants always has every permission:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob)
  True

In this example, 'P1' is a permission id.

Normally, interactions have participants:

  >>> class Participation:
  ...     interaction = None
  >>> participation = Participation()
  >>> participation.principal = principal
  >>> interaction.add(participation)

If we have participants, then we don't have a permission unless there
are grants:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob)
  False

Note, however, that we always have the CheckerPublic permission:

  >>> from zope.security.checker import CheckerPublic
  >>> interaction.checkPermission(CheckerPublic, ob)
  True

We make grants and denials on objects by adapting them to various
granting interfaces.  The objects returned from the adaptation are 
object-specific manager objects:

  >>> from zope.securitypolicy import interfaces
  >>> roleper  = interfaces.IRolePermissionManager(ob)
  >>> prinrole = interfaces.IPrincipalRoleManager(ob)
  >>> prinper  = interfaces.IPrincipalPermissionManager(ob)

The computations involved in checking permissions can be
significant. To reduce the computational cost, caching is used
extensively. We could invalidate the cache as we make grants, but the
adapters for making grants will automatically invalidate the cache of
the current interaction.  They use the security-management apis to do
this. To take advantage of the cache invalidation, we'll need to let
the security-management system manage our interactions.  First, we'll
set our security policy as the default:

  >>> import zope.security.management
  >>> oldpolicy = zope.security.management.setSecurityPolicy(
  ...      zope.securitypolicy.zopepolicy.ZopeSecurityPolicy)

and then we'll create a new interaction:

  >>> participation = Participation()
  >>> participation.principal = principal
  >>> zope.security.management.newInteraction(participation)
  >>> interaction = zope.security.management.getInteraction()

We normally provide access by granting permissions to roles for an object:

  >>> roleper.grantPermissionToRole('P1', 'R1')

and then granting roles to principals for an object (local roles):

  >>> prinrole.assignRoleToPrincipal('R1', 'bob')

The combination of these grants, which we call a role-based grant,
provides the permission:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob)
  True

We can also provide a permission directly:

  >>> prinper.grantPermissionToPrincipal('P2', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob)
  True

Permission grants or denials override role-based grant or denials.  So
if we deny P1:

  >>> prinper.denyPermissionToPrincipal('P1', 'bob')

we cause the interaction to lack the permission, despite the role
grants:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob)
  False

Similarly, even if we have a role-based denial of P2:

  >>> roleper.denyPermissionToRole('P2', 'R1')

we still have access, because of the permission-based grant:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob)
  True

A role-based denial doesn't actually deny a permission; rather it
prevents the granting of a permission. So, if we have both grants and
denials based on roles, we have access:

  >>> roleper.grantPermissionToRole('P3', 'R1')
  >>> roleper.grantPermissionToRole('P3', 'R2')
  >>> roleper.denyPermissionToRole('P3', 'R3')
  >>> prinrole.removeRoleFromPrincipal('R2', 'bob')
  >>> prinrole.assignRoleToPrincipal('R3', 'bob')

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob)
  True

Global grants
-------------

Grants made to an object are said to be "local".  We can also make
global grants:

  >>> from zope.securitypolicy.rolepermission import \
  ...     rolePermissionManager as roleperG
  >>> from zope.securitypolicy.principalpermission import \
  ...     principalPermissionManager as prinperG
  >>> from zope.securitypolicy.principalrole import \
  ...     principalRoleManager as prinroleG

And the same rules apply to global grants and denials.

  >>> roleperG.grantPermissionToRole('P1G', 'R1G', False)

In these tests, we aren't bothering to define any roles, permissions,
or principals, so we pass an extra argument that tells the granting
routines not to check the validity of the values.

  >>> prinroleG.assignRoleToPrincipal('R1G', 'bob', False)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob)
  True

  >>> prinperG.grantPermissionToPrincipal('P2G', 'bob', False)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob)
  True

  >>> prinperG.denyPermissionToPrincipal('P1G', 'bob', False)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob)
  False

  >>> roleperG.denyPermissionToRole('P2G', 'R1G', False)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob)
  True

  >>> roleperG.grantPermissionToRole('P3G', 'R1G', False)
  >>> roleperG.grantPermissionToRole('P3G', 'R2G', False)
  >>> roleperG.denyPermissionToRole('P3G', 'R3G', False)
  >>> prinroleG.removeRoleFromPrincipal('R2G', 'bob', False)
  >>> prinroleG.assignRoleToPrincipal('R3G', 'bob', False)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob)
  True

Local versus global grants
--------------------------

We, of course, acquire global grants by default:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob)
  True

Local role-based grants do not override global principal-specific denials:

  >>> roleper.grantPermissionToRole('P1G', 'R1G')
  >>> prinrole.assignRoleToPrincipal('R1G', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob)
  False

And local role-based denials don't override global
principal-grants:

  >>> roleper.denyPermissionToRole('P2G', 'R1G')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob)
  True

A local role-based deny can cancel a global role-based grant:

  >>> roleper.denyPermissionToRole('P3G', 'R1G')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob)
  False

and a local role-based grant can override a global role-based denial:

  >>> roleperG.denyPermissionToRole('P4G', 'R1G', False)
  >>> prinroleG.assignRoleToPrincipal('R1G', "bob", False)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob)
  False
  >>> roleper.grantPermissionToRole('P4G', 'R1G')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob)
  True
  >>> prinroleG.removeRoleFromPrincipal('R1G', "bob", False)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob)
  True

Of course, a local permission-based grant or denial overrides any
global setting and overrides local role-based grants or denials:

  >>> prinper.grantPermissionToPrincipal('P3G', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob)
  True

  >>> prinper.denyPermissionToPrincipal('P2G', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob)
  False

Sublocations
------------

We can have sub-locations. A sublocation of a location is an object
whose `__parent__` attribute is the location:

  >>> ob2 = Ob()
  >>> ob2.__parent__ = ob

By default, sublocations acquire grants from higher locations:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob2)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob2)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob2)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob2)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob2)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob2)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob2)
  True

Sublocation role-based grants do not override their parent
principal-specific denials:

  >>> roleper2  = interfaces.IRolePermissionManager(ob2)
  >>> prinrole2 = interfaces.IPrincipalRoleManager(ob2)
  >>> prinper2  = interfaces.IPrincipalPermissionManager(ob2)

  >>> roleper2.grantPermissionToRole('P1', 'R1')
  >>> prinrole2.assignRoleToPrincipal('R1', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob2)
  False

And local role-based denials don't override their parents
principal-grant:

  >>> roleper2.denyPermissionToRole('P2', 'R1')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob2)
  True

A local role-based deny can cancel a parent role-based grant:

  >>> roleper2.denyPermissionToRole('P3', 'R1')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob2)
  False

and a local role-based grant can override a parent role-based denial:

  >>> roleper.denyPermissionToRole('P4', 'R1')
  >>> prinrole.assignRoleToPrincipal('R1', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4', ob2)
  False
  >>> roleper2.grantPermissionToRole('P4', 'R1')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4', ob2)
  True
  >>> prinrole.removeRoleFromPrincipal('R1', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4', ob2)
  True


Of course, a local permission-based grant or denial overrides any
global setting and overrides local role-based grants or denials:

  >>> prinper.grantPermissionToPrincipal('P3', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob2)
  True

  >>> prinper.denyPermissionToPrincipal('P2', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob2)
  False

If an object is not annotatable, but does have a parent, it will get
its grants from its parent:

  >>> class C:
  ...     pass

  >>> ob3 = C()
  >>> ob3.__parent__ = ob

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob3)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob3)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob3)
  True

The same results will be had if there are multiple non-annotatable
objects:

  >>> ob3.__parent__ = C()
  >>> ob3.__parent__.__parent__ = ob

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob3)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob3)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob3)
  True

and if an object doesn't have a parent:

  >>> ob4 = C()

it will have whatever grants were made globally:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob4)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob4)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob4)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob4)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob4)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob4)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob4)
  False

  >>> prinroleG.assignRoleToPrincipal('R1G', "bob", False)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob4)
  True

We'll get the same result if we have a non-annotatable parent without a
parent:

  >>> ob3.__parent__ = C()

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob3)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob3)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob3)
  False

The Anonymous role
------------------

The security policy defines a special role named "zope.Anonymous".  All
principals have this role and the role cannot be taken away.

  >>> roleperG.grantPermissionToRole('P5', 'zope.Anonymous', False)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P5', ob2)
  True

Proxies
-------

Objects may be proxied:

  >>> from zope.security.checker import ProxyFactory
  >>> ob = ProxyFactory(ob)
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob)
  True

as may their parents:

  >>> ob3 = C()
  >>> ob3.__parent__ = ob

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3', ob3)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P1G', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P2G', ob3)
  False
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P3G', ob3)
  True
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('P4G', ob3)
  True

Groups
------

Principals may have groups.  Groups are also principals (and, thus,
may have groups).

If a principal has groups, the groups are available as group ids in
the principal's `groups` attribute.  The interaction has to convert
these group ids to group objects, so that it can tell whether the
groups have groups.  It does this by calling the `getPrincipal` method
on the principal authentication service, which is responsible for,
among other things, converting a principal id to a principal.
For our examples here, we'll create and register a stub principal
authentication service:

  >>> from zope.authentication.interfaces import IAuthentication
  >>> class FauxPrincipals(object):
  ...     zope.interface.implements(IAuthentication)
  ...     def __init__(self):
  ...         self.data = {}
  ...     def __setitem__(self, key, value):
  ...         self.data[key] = value
  ...     def __getitem__(self, key):
  ...         return self.data[key]
  ...     def getPrincipal(self, id):
  ...         return self.data[id]

  >>> auth = FauxPrincipals()

  >>> from zope.component import provideUtility
  >>> provideUtility(auth, IAuthentication)

Let's define a group:

  >>> auth['g1'] = Principal('g1')

Let's put the principal in our group.  We do that by adding the group id
to the new principals groups:

  >>> principal.groups.append('g1')

Of course, the principal doesn't have permissions not granted:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP1', ob)
  False

Now, if we grant a permission to the group:

  >>> prinper.grantPermissionToPrincipal('gP1', 'g1')

We see that our principal has the permission:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP1', ob)
  True

This works even if the group grant is global:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP1G', ob)
  False

  >>> prinperG.grantPermissionToPrincipal('gP1G', 'g1', True)

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP1G', ob)
  True

Grants are, of course, acquired:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP1', ob2)
  True

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP1G', ob2)
  True

Inner grants can override outer grants:

  >>> prinper2.denyPermissionToPrincipal('gP1', 'g1')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP1', ob2)
  False

But principal grants always trump group grants:

  >>> prinper2.grantPermissionToPrincipal('gP1', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP1', ob2)
  True

Groups can have groups too:

  >>> auth['g2'] = Principal('g2')
  >>> auth['g1'].groups.append('g2')

If we grant to the new group:

  >>> prinper.grantPermissionToPrincipal('gP2', 'g2')

Then we, of course have that permission too:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP2', ob2)
  True

Just as principal grants override group grants, group grants can
override other group grants:

  >>> prinper.denyPermissionToPrincipal('gP2', 'g1')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP2', ob2)
  False

Principals can be in more than one group. Let's define a new group:

  >>> auth['g3'] = Principal('g3')
  >>> principal.groups.append('g3')
  >>> prinper.grantPermissionToPrincipal('gP2', 'g3')

Now, the principal has two groups. In one group, the permission 'gP2'
is denied, but in the other, it is allowed.  In a case like this, the
permission is allowed:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP2', ob2)
  True

In a case where a principal has two or more groups, the group denies
prevent allows from their parents. They don't prevent the principal
from getting an allow from another principal.

Grants can be inherited from ancestor groups through multiple paths.
Let's grant a permission to g2 and deny it to g1:

  >>> prinper.grantPermissionToPrincipal('gP3', 'g2')
  >>> prinper.denyPermissionToPrincipal('gP3', 'g1')

Now, as before, the deny in g1 blocks the grant in g2:

  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP3', ob2)
  False

Let's make g2 a group of g3:

  >>> auth['g3'].groups.append('g2')

Now, we get g2's grant through g3, and access is allowed:

  >>> interaction.invalidate_cache()
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP3', ob2)
  True

We can assign roles to groups:

  >>> prinrole.assignRoleToPrincipal('gR1', 'g2')

and get permissions through the roles:

  >>> roleper.grantPermissionToRole('gP4', 'gR1')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP4', ob2)
  True

we can override role assignments to groups through subgroups:

  >>> prinrole.removeRoleFromPrincipal('gR1', 'g1')
  >>> prinrole.removeRoleFromPrincipal('gR1', 'g3')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP4', ob2)
  False

and through principals:

  >>> prinrole.assignRoleToPrincipal('gR1', 'bob')
  >>> interaction.checkPermission('gP4', ob2)
  True


We clean up the changes we made in these examples:

  >>> zope.security.management.endInteraction()
  >>> ignore = zope.security.management.setSecurityPolicy(oldpolicy)