/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ZEO/tests/Cache.py is in python-zodb 1:3.10.7-1.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 | ##############################################################################
#
# Copyright (c) 2001, 2002 Zope Foundation and Contributors.
# All Rights Reserved.
#
# This software is subject to the provisions of the Zope Public License,
# Version 2.1 (ZPL). A copy of the ZPL should accompany this distribution.
# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
# WARRANTIES ARE DISCLAIMED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
# WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, AGAINST INFRINGEMENT, AND FITNESS
# FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
#
##############################################################################
"""Tests of the ZEO cache"""
from ZODB.tests.MinPO import MinPO
from ZODB.tests.StorageTestBase import zodb_unpickle
from transaction import Transaction
class TransUndoStorageWithCache:
def checkUndoInvalidation(self):
oid = self._storage.new_oid()
revid = self._dostore(oid, data=MinPO(23))
revid = self._dostore(oid, revid=revid, data=MinPO(24))
revid = self._dostore(oid, revid=revid, data=MinPO(25))
info = self._storage.undoInfo()
if not info:
# Preserved this comment, but don't understand it:
# "Perhaps we have an old storage implementation that
# does do the negative nonsense."
info = self._storage.undoInfo(0, 20)
tid = info[0]['id']
# Now start an undo transaction
t = Transaction()
t.note('undo1')
oids = self._begin_undos_vote(t, tid)
# Make sure this doesn't load invalid data into the cache
self._storage.load(oid, '')
self._storage.tpc_finish(t)
assert len(oids) == 1
assert oids[0] == oid
data, revid = self._storage.load(oid, '')
obj = zodb_unpickle(data)
assert obj == MinPO(24)
|