/usr/share/doc/yacas-doc/html/codingchapter1.html is in yacas-doc 1.3.3-2.
This file is owned by root:root, with mode 0o644.
The actual contents of the file can be viewed below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 | <html>
<head>
<title>Yacas under the hood</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="yacas.css" TYPE="text/css" MEDIA="screen">
</head>
<body>
<a name="c1">
</a>
<h1>
1. Yacas under the hood
</h1>
<p> </p>
This part of the manual is a somewhat in-depth explanation of the
Yacas programming language and environment. It assumes that you have worked
through the introductory tutorial. You should consult the function reference about how to use the various Yacas functions mentioned here.
<p>
<a name="c1s1">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.1 The Yacas architecture
</h2>
Yacas is designed as a small core engine that interprets a library
of scripts. The core engine provides the syntax parser and a number of
hard-wired functions, such as <b><tt>Set()</tt></b> or
<b><tt>MathExp()</tt></b> which cannot be redefined by the user. The script
library resides in the scripts directory "<b><tt>scripts/</tt></b>" and
contains higher-level definitions of functions and constants. The library
scripts are on equal footing with any code the user executes interactively
or any files the user loads.
<p>
Generally, all core functions have plain names and almost all are not
"bodied" or infix operators. The file <b><tt>corefunctions.h</tt></b> in the source
tree lists declarations of all kernel functions callable from Yacas; consult it for reference.
For many of the core functions, the script library already provides
convenient aliases. For instance, the addition operator "<b><tt>+</tt></b>" is defined in
the script <b><tt>scripts/standard</tt></b> while the actual addition of
numbers is performed through the built-in function
<b><tt>MathAdd</tt></b>.
<p>
<a name="c1s2">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.2 Startup, scripts and <b><tt>.def</tt></b> files
</h2>
When Yacas is first started or restarted, it executes the script
<b><tt>yacasinit.ys</tt></b> in the scripts directory. This script may load some other
scripts. In order to start up quickly, Yacas does not execute all other
library scripts at first run or at restart. It only executes the file
<b><tt>yacasinit.ys</tt></b> and all <b><tt>.def</tt></b> files in the scripts. The <b><tt>.def</tt></b> files tell the system where it can find definitions
for various library functions. Library is divided into "packages" stored in "repository" directories. For example, the function <b><tt>ArcTan</tt></b> is defined in the <b><tt>stdfuncs</tt></b> package; the library file is <b><tt>stdfuncs.rep/</tt></b><b><tt>code.ys</tt></b> and the <b><tt>.def</tt></b> file is <b><tt>stdfuncs.rep</tt></b><b><tt>/code.ys.def</tt></b>. The function <b><tt>ArcTan</tt></b>
mentioned in the <b><tt>.def</tt></b> file, therefore Yacas will know to load the package
<b><tt>stdfuncs</tt></b> when the user invokes <b><tt>ArcTan</tt></b>. This way Yacas
knows where to look for any given function without actually loading the
file where the function is defined.
<p>
There is one exception to the strategy of delayed loading of the library
scripts. Namely, the syntax definitions of infix, prefix, postfix and bodied
functions, such as <b><tt>Infix("*",4)</tt></b> cannot be delayed (it is currently in the
file <b><tt>stdopers.ys</tt></b>). If it were delayed, the Yacas parser would encounter <b><tt>1+2</tt></b>
(typed by the user) and generate a syntax error before it has a chance to load
the definition of the operator "<b><tt>+</tt></b>".
<p>
<a name="c1s3">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.3 Object types
</h2>
Yacas supports two basic kinds of objects: atoms and compounds. Atoms are (integer or real, arbitrary-precision) numbers such as <b><tt>2.71828</tt></b>, symbolic variables such as <b><tt>A3</tt></b> and character strings. Compounds include functions and expressions, e.g. <b><tt>Cos(a-b)</tt></b> and lists, e.g. <b><tt>{1+a,2+b,3+c}</tt></b>.
<p>
The type of an object is returned by the built-in function <b><tt>Type</tt></b>, for example:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> Type(a);
Out> "";
In> Type(F(x));
Out> "F";
In> Type(x+y);
Out> "+";
In> Type({1,2,3});
Out> "List";
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
Internally, atoms are stored as strings and compounds as lists. (The Yacas
lexical analyzer is case-sensitive, so <b><tt>List</tt></b> and
<b><tt>list</tt></b> are different atoms.) The functions
<b><tt>String()</tt></b> and <b><tt>Atom()</tt></b> convert between atoms and
strings. A Yacas list <b><tt>{1,2,3}</tt></b> is internally a list
<b><tt>(List 1 2 3)</tt></b> which is the same as a function call
<b><tt>List(1,2,3)</tt></b> and for this reason the "type" of a list is the
string <b><tt>"List"</tt></b>. During evaluation, atoms can be interpreted as
numbers, or as variables that may be bound to some value, while compounds are
interpreted as function calls.
<p>
Note that atoms that result from an <b><tt>Atom()</tt></b> call may be
invalid and never evaluate to anything. For example,
<b><tt>Atom(3X)</tt></b> is an atom with string representation "3X" but
with no other properties.
<p>
Currently, no other lowest-level objects are provided by the core engine besides numbers, atoms, strings, and lists. There is, however, a possibility to link some externally compiled code that will provide additional types of objects.
Those will be available in Yacas as "generic objects."
For example, fixed-size arrays are implemented in this way.
<p>
<a name="c1s4">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.4 Yacas evaluation scheme
</h2>
Evaluation of an object is performed either explicitly by the built-in
command <b><tt>Eval()</tt></b> or implicitly when assigning variables or calling functions
with the object as argument (except when a function does not evaluate that
argument). Evaluation of an object can be explicitly inhibited using <b><tt>Hold()</tt></b>.
To make a function not evaluate one of its arguments, a <b><tt>HoldArg(funcname, argname)</tt></b>
must be declared for that function.
<p>
Internally, all expressions are either atoms or lists (perhaps nested). Use
<b><tt>FullForm()</tt></b> to see the internal form of an expression. A Yacas list expression
written as <b><tt>{a, b}</tt></b> is represented internally as <b><tt>(List a b)</tt></b>, equivalently to
a function call <b><tt>List(a,b)</tt></b>.
<p>
Evaluation of an atom goes as follows: if the atom is bound locally as a
variable, the object it is bound to is returned, otherwise, if it is bound as a
global variable then that is returned. Otherwise, the atom is returned
unevaluated.
Note that if an atom is bound to an expression, that expression is considered as final and is not evaluated again.
<p>
Internal lists of atoms are generally interpreted in the following way: the first
atom of the list is some command, and the atoms following in the list are
considered the arguments. The engine first tries to find out if it is a
built-in command (core function). In that case, the function is executed.
Otherwise, it could be a user-defined function (with a "rule database"),
and in that case the rules from the database are applied to it. If none of
the rules are applicable, or if no rules are defined for it, the object is
returned unevaluated.
<p>
Application of a rule to an expression transforms it into a different
expression to which other rules may be applicable. Transformation by matching
rules continues until no more rules are applicable, or until a "terminating"
rule is encountered. A "terminating" rule is one that returns <b><tt>Hold()</tt></b> or
<b><tt>UnList()</tt></b> of some expression. Calling these functions gives an unevaluated
expression because it terminates the process of evaluation itself.
<p>
The main properties of this scheme are the following. When objects are
assigned to variables, they generally are evaluated (except if you are
using the <b><tt>Hold()</tt></b> function) because assignment
<b><tt>var := value</tt></b> is really a function call to
<b><tt>Set(var, value)</tt></b> and this function evaluates its second
argument (but not its first argument). When referencing that variable
again, the object which is its value will not be re-evaluated. Also, the
default behavior of the engine is to return the original expression if it
could not be evaluated. This is a desired behavior if evaluation is used
for simplifying expressions.
<p>
One major design flaw in Yacas (one that other functional languages like
LISP also have) is that when some expression is re-evaluated in another
environment, the local variables contained in the expression to be
evaluated might have a different meaning. In this case it might be useful
to use the functions <b><tt>LocalSymbols</tt></b> and
<b><tt>TemplateFunction</tt></b>. Calling
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
LocalSymbols(a,b)
a*b;
</pre></tr>
</table>
results in "<b><tt>a</tt></b>" and "<b><tt>b</tt></b>" in the multiplication being substituted with
unique symbols that can not clash with other variables that may be used
elsewhere. Use <b><tt>TemplateFunction</tt></b> instead of
<b><tt>Function</tt></b> to define a function whose parameters should be
treated as unique symbols.
<p>
Consider the following example:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> f1(x):=Apply("+",{x,x});
Out> True
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
The function <b><tt>f1</tt></b> simply adds its argument to itself. Now calling
this function with some argument:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> f1(Sin(a))
Out> 2*Sin(a)
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
yields the expected result. However, if we pass as an argument an
expression containing the variable <b><tt>x</tt></b>, things go wrong:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> f1(Sin(x))
Out> 2*Sin(Sin(x))
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
This happens because within the function, <b><tt>x</tt></b> is bound to <b><tt>Sin(x)</tt></b>,
and since it is passed as an argument to <b><tt>Apply</tt></b> it will be re-evaluated,
resulting in <b><tt>Sin(Sin(x))</tt></b>. <b><tt>TemplateFunction</tt></b> solves this by making sure
the arguments can not collide like this (by using <b><tt>LocalSymbols</tt></b>:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> TemplateFunction("f2",{x}) Apply("+",{x,x});
Out> True
In> f2(Sin(a))
Out> 2*Sin(a)
In> f2(Sin(x))
Out> 2*Sin(x)
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
In general one has to be careful when functions like <b><tt>Apply</tt></b>, <b><tt>Map</tt></b>
or <b><tt>Eval</tt></b> (or derivatives) are used.
<p>
<a name="c1s5">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.5 Rules
</h2>
<i>Rules</i> are special properties of functions that
are applied when the function object is being evaluated. A function object could
have just one rule bound to it; this is similar to a "subroutine" having a "function
body" in usual procedural languages. However, Yacas function objects can
also have several rules bound to them. This is analogous of having several
alternative "function bodies" that are executed under different
circumstances. This design is more suitable for symbolic manipulations.
<p>
A function is identified by its name as returned by <b><tt>Type</tt></b>
and the number of arguments, or "arity". The same name can be used with
different arities to define different functions: <b><tt>f(x)</tt></b> is
said to "have arity 1" and <b><tt>f(x,y)</tt></b> has arity 2. Each of
these functions may possess its own set of specific rules, which we shall
call a "rule database" of a function.
<p>
Each function should be first declared with the built-in command
<b><tt>RuleBase</tt></b> as follows:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
RuleBase("FunctionName",{argument list});
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
So, a new (and empty) rule database for <b><tt>f(x,y)</tt></b> could be
created by typing <b><tt>RuleBase("f",{x,y})</tt></b>. The names for the
arguments "x" and "y" here are arbitrary, but they will be globally stored
and must be later used in descriptions of particular rules for the function
<b><tt>f</tt></b>. After the new rulebase declaration, the evaluation engine of Yacas
will begin to really recognize <b><tt>f</tt></b> as a function, even though no function
body or equivalently no rules have been defined for it yet.
<p>
The shorthand operator <b><tt>:=</tt></b> for creating user functions that
we illustrated in the tutorial is actually defined in the scripts and it
makes the requisite call to the <b><tt>RuleBase()</tt></b> function.
After a <b><tt>RuleBase()</tt></b> call you can specify parsing
properties for the function; for example, you could make it an
infix or bodied operator.
<p>
Now we can add some rules to the rule database for a function. A rule
simply states that if a specific function object with a specific arity is
encountered in an expression and if a certain predicate is true, then
Yacas should replace this function with some other expression. To tell Yacas about a new rule you can use the built-in <b><tt>Rule</tt></b> command. This command is what does the real work for the somewhat more aesthetically pleasing <b><tt>... # ... <-- ...</tt></b> construct we have seen in the tutorial. You do not have to call <b><tt>RuleBase()</tt></b> explicitly if you use that construct.
<p>
Here is the general syntax for a <b><tt>Rule()</tt></b> call:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
Rule("foo", arity, precedence, pred) body;
</pre></tr>
</table>
This specifies that for function <b><tt>foo</tt></b> with given
<b><tt>arity</tt></b> (<b><tt>foo(a,b)</tt></b> has arity 2), there is a
rule that if <b><tt>pred</tt></b> is true, then <b><tt>body</tt></b>
should be evaluated, and the original expression replaced by the result.
Predicate and body can use the symbolic names of arguments that were
declared in the <b><tt>RuleBase</tt></b> call.
<p>
All rules for a given function can be erased with a call to <b><tt>Retract(funcname, arity)</tt></b>. This is useful, for instance, when too many rules have been entered in the interactive mode. This call undefines the function and also invalidates the <b><tt>RuleBase</tt></b> declaration.
<p>
You can specify that function arguments are not evaluated before they are
bound to the parameter: <b><tt>HoldArg("foo",a)</tt></b> would then
declare that the a arguments in both <b><tt>foo(a)</tt></b> and <b><tt>foo(a,b)</tt></b> should not be evaluated before bound to <b><tt>a</tt></b>. Here
the argument name <b><tt>a</tt></b> should be the same as that used in the <b><tt>RuleBase()</tt></b> call when declaring these functions.
Inhibiting evaluation of certain arguments is useful for procedures
performing actions based partly on a variable in the expression, such as
integration, differentiation, looping, etc., and will be typically used for
functions that are algorithmic and procedural by
nature.
<p>
Rule-based programming normally makes heavy use of recursion and it is
important to control the order in which replacement rules are to be
applied. For this purpose, each rule is given a <i>precedence</i>.
Precedences go from low to high, so all rules with precedence 0 will be
tried before any rule with precedence 1.
<p>
You can assign several rules to one and the same function, as long as some of the predicates differ. If none of the predicates are true,
the function is returned with its arguments evaluated.
<p>
This scheme is slightly slower for ordinary functions that just have one
rule (with the predicate <b><tt>True</tt></b>), but it is a desired
behavior for symbolic manipulation. You can gradually build up your own functions, incrementally testing their properties.
<p>
<a name="c1s6">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.6 Examples of using rules
</h2>
As a simple illustration, here are the actual <b><tt>RuleBase()</tt></b>
and <b><tt>Rule()</tt></b> calls needed to define the factorial function:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> RuleBase("f",{n});
Out> True;
In> Rule("f", 1, 10, n=0) 1;
Out> True;
In> Rule("f", 1, 20, IsInteger(n) \
And n>0) n*f(n-1);
Out> True;
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
This definition is entirely equivalent to the one in the tutorial. <b><tt>f(4)</tt></b>
should now return 24, while <b><tt>f(a)</tt></b> should return just <b><tt>f(a)</tt></b> if <b><tt>a</tt></b> is not
bound to any value.
<p>
The <b><tt>Rule</tt></b> commands in this example specified two rules for function <b><tt>f</tt></b>
with arity 1: one rule with precedence 10 and predicate <b><tt>n=0</tt></b>, and another with precedence 20 and the predicate that returns <b><tt>True</tt></b> only
if <b><tt>n</tt></b> is a positive integer. Rules with lowest precedence get evaluated
first, so the rule with precedence 10 will be tried before the rule with
precedence 20. Note that the predicates and the body use the name "n"
declared by the <b><tt>RuleBase()</tt></b> call.
<p>
After declaring <b><tt>RuleBase()</tt></b> for a function, you could
tell the parser to treat this function as a postfix operator:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> Postfix("f");
Out> True;
In> 4 f;
Out> 24;
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
There is already a function <b><tt>Function</tt></b> defined in the
standard scripts that allows you to construct simple functions. An example
would be
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
Function ("FirstOf", {list}) list[1] ;
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
which simply returns the first element of a list. This could also have
been written as
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
Function("FirstOf", {list})
[
list[1] ;
];
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
As mentioned before, the brackets <b><tt>[ ]</tt></b> are also used to combine multiple
operations to be performed one after the other. The result of the last
performed action is returned.
<p>
Finally, the function <b><tt>FirstOf</tt></b> could also have been
defined by typing
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
FirstOf(list):=list[1] ;
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
<a name="c1s7">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.7 Structured programming and control flow
</h2>
Some functions useful for control flow are already defined in Yacas's standard library. Let's look at a possible definition of a looping function <b><tt>ForEach</tt></b>. We shall here consider a somewhat simple-minded definition, while the actual <b><tt>ForEach</tt></b> as defined in the standard script "controlflow" is a little more sophisticated.
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
Function("ForEach",{foreachitem,
foreachlist,foreachbody})
[
Local(foreachi,foreachlen);
foreachlen:=Length(foreachlist);
foreachi:=0;
While (foreachi < foreachlen)
[
foreachi++;
MacroLocal(foreachitem);
MacroSet(foreachitem,
foreachlist[foreachi]);
Eval(foreachbody);
];
];
Bodied("ForEach");
UnFence("ForEach",3);
HoldArg("ForEach",foreachitem);
HoldArg("ForEach",foreachbody);
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
Functions like this should probably be defined in a separate file. You can
load such a file with the command <b><tt>Load("file")</tt></b>. This is an example of a macro-like function. Let's first look at the last few
lines. There is a <b><tt>Bodied(...)</tt></b> call, which states that the syntax for the function <b><tt>ForEach()</tt></b> is <b><tt>ForEach(item,{list}) body;</tt></b>
-- that is, the last argument to the command <b><tt>ForEach</tt></b> should be outside its
brackets. <b><tt>UnFence(...)</tt></b> states that this function can use the local
variables of the calling function. This is necessary, since the body to be
evaluated for each item will probably use some local variables from that
surrounding.
<p>
Finally, <b><tt>HoldArg("function",argument)</tt></b> specifies that
the argument "<b><tt>argument</tt></b>" should not be evaluated before being
bound to that variable. This holds for <b><tt>foreachitem</tt></b> and
<b><tt>foreachbody</tt></b>, since <b><tt>foreachitem</tt></b> specifies
a variable to be set to that value, and <b><tt>foreachbody</tt></b> is the
expression that should be evaluated <i>after</i> that variable
is set.
<p>
Inside the body of the function definition there are calls to <b><tt>Local(...)</tt></b>.
<b><tt>Local()</tt></b> declares some local variable that will only be visible within a block
<b><tt>[ ... ]</tt></b>. The command <b><tt>MacroLocal()</tt></b> works almost the same. The difference is
that it evaluates its arguments before performing the action on it. This is
needed in this case, because the variable <b><tt>foreachitem</tt></b> is bound to a variable
to be used as the loop iterator, and it is <i>the variable it is bound to</i>
that we want to make local, not <b><tt>foreachitem</tt></b> itself. <b><tt>MacroSet()</tt></b> works
similarly: it does the same as <b><tt>Set()</tt></b> except that it also first evaluates the
first argument, thus setting the variable requested by the user of this
function. The <b><tt>Macro</tt></b>... functions in the built-in functions generally perform
the same action as their non-macro versions, apart from evaluating an argument
it would otherwise not evaluate.
<p>
To see the function in action, you could type:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
ForEach(i,{1,2,3}) [Write(i); NewLine();];
</pre></tr>
</table>
This should print 1, 2 and 3, each on a new line.
<p>
Note: the variable names "foreach..." have been chosen so they won't get
confused with normal variables you use. This is a major design flaw in this
language. Suppose there was a local variable <b><tt>foreachitem</tt></b>, defined in the
calling function, and used in <b><tt>foreachbody</tt></b>. These two would collide, and the
interpreter would use only the last defined version. In general, when writing a
function that calls <b><tt>Eval()</tt></b>, it is a good idea to use variable names that can
not collide with user's variables. This is generally the single largest cause
of bugs when writing programs in Yacas. This issue should be addressed in the
future.
<p>
<a name="c1s8">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.8 Additional syntactic sugar
</h2>
The parser is extended slightly to allow for fancier constructs.
<p>
<ul><li>Lists, e.g. </li><b><tt>{a,b}</tt></b>. This then
is parsed into the internal notation <b><tt>(List a b)</tt></b> , but
will be printed again as <b><tt>{a,b};</tt></b>
<li>Statement blocks such as
</li><b><tt>[</tt></b> statement1 <b><tt>;</tt></b> statement2<b><tt>;];</tt></b>. This
is parsed into a Lisp object <b><tt>(Prog</tt></b> <b><tt>(</tt></b>statement1 <b><tt>)</tt></b> <b><tt>(</tt></b>statement2 <b><tt>))</tt></b>, and printed out again in the proper form.
<li> Object argument accessors in the form of
</li><b><tt>expr[ index ]</tt></b>. These
are mapped internally to <b><tt>Nth(expr,index)</tt></b>. The value of <b><tt>index</tt></b>=0 returns the
operator of the object, <b><tt>index</tt></b>=1 the first argument, etc. So,
if <b><tt>expr</tt></b> is <b><tt>foo(bar)</tt></b>, then
<b><tt>expr[0]</tt></b> returns <b><tt>foo</tt></b>, and
<b><tt>expr[1]</tt></b> returns <b><tt>bar</tt></b>. Since lists of the form
<b><tt>{...}</tt></b> are essentially the same as
<b><tt>List(...)</tt></b>, the same accessors
can be used on lists.
</ul>
<p>
<ul><li>Function blocks such as
</li><table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
While (i < 10)
[
Write(i);
i:=i+1;
];
</pre></tr>
</table>
The expression directly following the <b><tt>While(...)</tt></b> block is added as a last argument to the <b><tt>While(...)</tt></b> call. So <b><tt>While(a)b;</tt></b> is parsed to the internal form <b><tt>(While a b).</tt></b>
</ul>
<p>
This scheme allows coding the algorithms in an almost C-like syntax.
<p>
Strings are generally represented with quotes around them, e.g.
"this is a string". Backslash <b><tt>\</tt></b> in a string will unconditionally add the
next character to the string, so a quote can be added with <b><tt>\"</tt></b> (a backslash-quote sequence).
<p>
<a name="c1s9">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.9 Using "Macro rules" (e.g. <b><tt>NFunction</tt></b>)
</h2>
The Yacas language allows to have rules whose definitions are generated at
runtime. In other words, it is possible to write rules (or "functions") that,
as a side-effect, will define other rules, and those other rules will depend on
some parts of the expression the original function was applied to.
<p>
This is accomplished using functions <b><tt>MacroRuleBase</tt></b>, <b><tt>MacroRule</tt></b>, <b><tt>MacroRulePattern</tt></b>. These functions evaluate their arguments (including the rule name, predicate and body) and define the rule that results from this evaluation.
<p>
Normal, "non-Macro" calls such as <b><tt>Rule()</tt></b> will not evaluate their arguments and this is a desired feature. For example, suppose we defined a new predicate like this,
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
RuleBase("IsIntegerOrString, {x});
Rule("IsIntegerOrString", 1, 1, True)
IsInteger(x) And IsString(x);
</pre></tr>
</table>
If the <b><tt>Rule()</tt></b> call were to evaluate its arguments, then the "body" argument,
<b><tt>IsInteger(x) And IsString(x)</tt></b>, would be evaluated to <b><tt>False</tt></b> since <b><tt>x</tt></b> is an
atom, so we would have defined the predicate to be always <b><tt>False</tt></b>, which is not
at all what we meant to do. For this reason, the <b><tt>Rule</tt></b> calls do not evaluate
their arguments.
<p>
Consider however the following situation. Suppose we have a function
<b><tt>f(arglist)</tt></b> where <b><tt>arglist</tt></b> is its list of arguments, and suppose we want to
define a function <b><tt>Nf(arglist)</tt></b> with the same arguments which will evaluate
<b><tt>f(arglist)</tt></b> and return only when all arguments from <b><tt>arglist</tt></b> are numbers, and
return unevaluated <b><tt>Nf(arglist)</tt></b> otherwise. This can of course be done by a usual rule such as
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
Rule("Nf", 3, 0, IsNumericList({x,y,z}))
<-- "f" @ {x,y,z};
</pre></tr>
</table>
Here <b><tt>IsNumericList</tt></b> is a predicate that checks whether all elements of a given
list are numbers. (We deliberately used a <b><tt>Rule</tt></b> call instead of an
easier-to-read <b><tt><--</tt></b> operator to make it easier to compare with what follows.)
<p>
However, this will have to be done for every function <b><tt>f</tt></b> separately. We would
like to define a procedure that will define <b><tt>Nf</tt></b>, given <i>any</i> function
<b><tt>f</tt></b>. We would like to use it like this:
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
NFunction("Nf", "f", {x,y,z});
</pre></tr>
</table>
After this function call we expect to be able to use the function <b><tt>Nf</tt></b>.
<p>
Here is how we could naively try to implement <b><tt>NFunction</tt></b> (and fail):
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
NFunction(new'name, old'name, arg'list) := [
MacroRuleBase(new'name, arg'list);
MacroRule(new'name, Length(arg'list), 0,
IsNumericList(arg'list)
)
new'name @ arg'list;
];
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
Now, this just does not do anything remotely right. <b><tt>MacroRule</tt></b> evaluates its
arguments. Since <b><tt>arg'list</tt></b> is an atom and not a list of numbers at the time we are defining this,
<b><tt>IsNumericList(arg'list)</tt></b> will evaluate to <b><tt>False</tt></b> and the new
rule will be defined with a predicate that is always <b><tt>False</tt></b>, i.e. it will be
never applied.
<p>
The right way to figure this out is to realize that the <b><tt>MacroRule</tt></b> call
evaluates all its arguments and passes the results to a <b><tt>Rule</tt></b> call. So we need
to see exactly what <b><tt>Rule()</tt></b> call we need to produce and then we need to
prepare the arguments of <b><tt>MacroRule</tt></b> so that they evaluate to the right values.
The <b><tt>Rule()</tt></b> call we need is something like this:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
Rule("actual new name", <actual # of args>, 0,
IsNumericList({actual arg list})
) "actual new name" @ {actual arg list};
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
Note that we need to produce expressions such as <b><tt>"new name" @ arg'list</tt></b> and not <i>results</i> of evaluation of these expressions. We can produce these expressions by using <b><tt>UnList()</tt></b>, e.g.
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
UnList({Atom("@"), "Sin", {x}})
</pre></tr>
</table>
produces
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
"Sin" @ {x};
</pre></tr>
</table>
but not <b><tt>Sin(x)</tt></b>, and
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
UnList({IsNumericList, {1,2,x}})
</pre></tr>
</table>
produces the expression
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
IsNumericList({1,2,x});
</pre></tr>
</table>
which is not further evaluated.
<p>
Here is a second version of <b><tt>NFunction()</tt></b> that works:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
NFunction(new'name, old'name, arg'list) := [
MacroRuleBase(new'name, arg'list);
MacroRule(new'name, Length(arg'list), 0,
UnList({IsNumericList, arg'list})
)
UnList({Atom("@"), old'name, arg'list});
];
</pre></tr>
</table>
Note that we used <b><tt>Atom("@")</tt></b> rather than just the bare atom <b><tt>@</tt></b> because <b><tt>@</tt></b> is
a prefix operator and prefix operator names as bare atoms do not parse (they
would be confused with applications of a prefix operator to what follows).
<p>
Finally, there is a more concise (but less general) way of defining
<b><tt>NFunction()</tt></b> for functions with known number of arguments, using the
backquoting mechanism. The backquote operation will first substitute variables
in an expression, without evaluating anything else, and then will evaluate the
resulting expression a second time. The code for functions of just one variable may look like this:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
N1Function(new'name, old'name) :=
`( @new'name(x_IsNumber) <-- @old'name(x) );
</pre></tr>
</table>
This executes a little slower than the above version, because the backquote
needs to traverse the expression twice, but makes for much more readable code.
<p>
<a name="c1s10">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.10 Macro expansion
</h2>
Yacas supports macro expansion (back-quoting). An expression can be
back-quoted by putting a <b><tt>`</tt></b> in front of it. Within the back-quoted
expression, all atoms that have a <b><tt>@</tt></b> in front of them get replaced
with the value of that atom (treated as a variable), and then the
resulting expression is evaluated:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> x:=y
Out> y;
In> `(@x:=2)
Out> 2;
In> x
Out> y;
In> y
Out> 2;
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
This is useful in cases where within an expression one sub-expression
is not evaluated. For instance, transformation rules can be built
dynamically, before being declared. This is a particularly powerful
feature that allows a programmer to write programs that write programs.
The idea is borrowed from Lisp.
<p>
As the above example shows, there are similarities with the <b><tt>Macro...</tt></b>
functions, that serve the same purpose for specific expressions.
For example, for the above code, one could also have called <b><tt>MacroSet</tt></b>:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> MacroSet(x,3)
Out> True;
In> x
Out> y;
In> y
Out> 3;
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
The difference is that <b><tt>MacroSet</tt></b>, and in general the <b><tt>Macro...</tt></b>
functions, are faster than their back-quoted counterparts.
This is because with back-quoting, first a new expression is
built before it is evaluated. The advantages of back-quoting
are readability and flexibility (the number of <b><tt>Macro...</tt></b>
functions is limited, whereas back-quoting can be used anywhere).
<p>
When an <b><tt>@</tt></b> operator is placed in front of a function call, the
function call is replaced:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> plus:=Add
Out> Add;
In> `(@plus(1,2,3))
Out> 6;
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
Application of pure functions is also possible (as of version 1.0.53)
by using macro expansion:
<p>
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
In> pure:={{a,b},a+b};
Out> {{a,b},a+b};
In> ` @pure(2,3);
Out> 5;
</pre></tr>
</table>
<p>
Pure (nameless) functions are useful for declaring a temporary function,
that has functionality depending on the current environment it is in,
or as a way to call driver functions. In the case of drivers (interfaces
to specific functionality), a variable can be bound to a function to
be evaluated to perform a specific task. That way several drivers can
be around, with one bound to the variables holding the functions that
will be called.
<p>
<a name="c1s11">
</a>
<h2>
<hr>1.11 Scope of variable bindings
</h2>
When setting variables or retrieving variable values, variables are
automatically bound global by default. You can explicitly specify variables to
be local to a block such as a function body; this will make them invisible
outside the block. Blocks have the form <b><tt>[</tt></b> statement1<b><tt>;</tt></b> statement2<b><tt>;</tt></b> <b><tt>]</tt></b> and local variables are declared by the
<b><tt>Local()</tt></b> function.
<p>
When entering a block, a new stack frame is pushed for the local variables; it
means that the code inside a block doesn't see the local variables of the <i>caller</i> either!
You can tell the interpreter that a function should see local variables of the
calling environment; to do this, declare
<table cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tr><td width=100% bgcolor="#DDDDEE"><pre>
UnFence(funcname, arity)
</pre></tr>
</table>
on that function.
<p>
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript">
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
_uacct = "UA-2425144-1";
urchinTracker();
</script>
</body>
</html>
|